Quantcast
Channel: Colorful Animation Expressions
Viewing all 122 articles
Browse latest View live

Showreel and Video Essays

$
0
0
A few weeks ago I have finally come around to compile a new animation showreel. These are mostly scenes from films I have been working on. The music is by Christian Wallner and performed by his band Piri Piri:

Animation Showreel 2017 from
Oswald Iten.

Video Essays
If someone asked me a few weeks ago, I told them that I would never do a video essay on Christopher Nolan's films because there are already so many out there and his films get a disproportionate amount of attention compared to many filmmakers I wish would be household names by now.

Besides, I think that formally (how he structures plot/narrative) his films are much more interesting than stylistically (blocking, framing, editing). But when I studied the temporal structure of all his feature films for a lecture on DUNKIRK (2017), I just found too many interesting aspects that I have never seen somebody analyze in detail. So whenever I have some time at my hands, I am trying to shape these observations into video essays.

In the meantime, here is a silent video essay about a prop from DUMBO (1941) that hasn't found its way to this blog so for:
 
Inanimate Objects #1: The Versatile Bathtub from Oswald Iten.

Apart from the really obvious ones like the bicycle in LADRI DI BICICLETTE or some McGuffins, props as storytelling devices have been neglected in comparison to many other aspects of film making for too long a time.
This video essay is an attempt to highlight what I have thought to be a perfectly economical use of a visual element and a prop in DUMBO.


STRANGER THINGS 2: First Impressions (SPOILERS GALORE)

$
0
0

After finishing STRANGER THINGS 2 last Saturday, there was so much on my mind that I immediately felt the urge to blog about why I liked this "Sequel" so much and why even Chapter Seven made sense to me. Fast forward to five days later: when I finally found the time, the urge may not be that strong anymore, but part of my mind still revels in that alternate universe the Duffer brothers have created. They are still first impressions as I have not gone back to any portion of the show for closer scrutiny - so don't expect any exploration of the pop songs that define the characters, the newly rich color schemes, the unobtrusive CGI, the cinematic editing rhythm or the strikingly consistent visual motifs.

I usually refrain from literal fan art. But if the show itself is some kind of fan "art", I guess it's ok...
Instead, the following is more of a shapeless rant about little (and lost) sisters and a surrogate father: 

I expected STRANGER THINGS 2 to be bigger and more expensive. What I did not expect was that this was actually a good thing. At times it felt like watching THE GODFATHER PART II of 1980s nostalgia films (in context and scope, not content or absolute cinematic quality): expanding in every direction with more characters, stronger arcs, definitely more horror thrills and even more heartbreaking, more cinematic, more elaborate flashback structure with now-memories, shared flashbacks and self-imposed telepathic seances. 

The Universe is Expanding 
The first substantial new character we meet is Madmax who is not only the new tough girl in town, a perceived security risk and the subject of a love triangle, her not really being part of "the party" also mirrors aspects of Eleven's role. Max, however, has a tougher stand since Eleven is still very much on Mike's and the audience's mind. Even though Madmax and her step-brother are not closely connected to either the saving-Will-quest or Eleven's coming-of-age story, they liven the place up considerably. And talking of little sisters: I knew immediately that there would be a "little-sister-Erica" meme the minute she appeared on the screen! Priah Ferguson as Lucas' little sister is a riot in every single scene she's in. Her calling Lucas (the most reasonable of the four friends) a nerd was only the first of several hilarious throwaways.

And suddenly, Mikey from THE GOONIES stumbles in, all grown up, chubby, listening to Kenny Rogers and going by the name of Bob Newby "Superbrain". Sean Astin is just perfectly cast as Winona Ryder's lovably awkward love interest. And while the Duffer brothers thankfully refuse to conveniently kill off any young lover in the two love triangles (though we really fear for jock-come-babysitter Steve a few times), Bob at least helped save the day before he was devoured by a demodog. Most interesting about those predators (actually developed from pollywogs) are their dog-like characteristics that obviously allow for a bond of trust between Dart and Dustin which means that unlike the JAWS-inspired Demogorgon of Season 1 they are not just mindless killing machines.

In fact, all the villains got more complex: the Upside-Down is now run by a bodiless "feeling", a shadow monster or Mindflayer (to stay within the D&D analogy) that controls those hive-minded demodogs. On the human side, the faceless secret government agents may still be the real scare, but Dr. Owens and his scientist colleagues are more ambiguous than we first thought. Besides, there is a hint that Papa Brenner is still around somewhere.

Beyond Pop References
In fact, binge-watching STRANGER THINGS 2 felt less like watching a movie than reading a Harry Potter novel - a sensation I had not experienced for years. Like Rowling's page-turners (and the many Stephen King stories it is partly based on), STRANGER THINGS is essentially a coming-of-age story in a horror-thriller format that made me drop my guard and suspend any disbelief completely right from the beginning. For me, the key to the show's giant success lies in the strength of the relationships and of course the immensely talented (and professional) actors that infuse those children with relatable emotions. Besides, missing sibling stories always draw me in.

I think STRANGER THINGS works so well because even though it lures you in by its obvious play on pop references and cinema tropes, the protagonists themselves don't seem to know any of that (at least no more than Elliott knows about Yoda in E.T., a template for season 1) and all the characters and relationships feel sincere. Thankfully, STRANGER THINGS never breaks the fourth wall. Even when Max mentions that the story Lucas just told her (essentially the plot of Season 1) sounded derivative and lacked originality, it taps into the whole conspiracy theory/lies theme instead of feeling like a meta-comment for laughs. We can absolutely see what she means and still feel the urge to yell at her that this was for real. Because – let's face it – the plot of STRANGER THINGS sometimes feels like it really could be from the 80s.

Chief Hopper
There are two main narrative strands in Season 2: Firstly, Will's attempts at reintegration, his infiltration by the Mindflayer and the party's mission to save Will, Hawkins and possibly the world. As the boys are not pitted against any external bullies, the tensions within the group are foregrounded and Mike struggles the most until Will confides in him after the Halloween vision. The other one is Eleven's slow path to a normal life and is fuelled by a strong desire (strongly shared by the audience) to reunite with Mike while in reality she is hidden from the "bad men" for almost a year. Eleven's story also discusses the overarching themes of "promise", "friends don't lie" and "mutual protection" most elaborately.

Both strands are linked by chief Jim Hopper who - after wearing Chief Brody's clothes and Indiana Jones's hat - takes on the John Carpenter-Kurt Russell role and graduates at the same time not only to surrogate father to Eleven but an admirable hero much stronger and complex than I had ever expected him to become after Season 1. Despite his shortcomings and overprotectiveness, Hopper may be the best father in Hawkins based on what we learn about the homelives of the other children.

So while the events around Will pulled the heartstrings - Noah Schnapp really rose to the occasion - the relationship between Eleven and Hopper provoked so many concurring emotions that by the time Eleven finally met her real mother for the first time in the masterfully directed Andrew-Stanton-episodes, I was actually wanting to follow her story more than the approaching demodogs in the lab.

My only Inktober drawing...
Chapter Seven
Of course, right from the initial precredits sequence I was looking for clues that connect the Chicago gang to Eleven's story. So while I was interested in how the story world could be opened up beyond Hawkins I also secretely hoped that we never left that microcosm. And when she got on the bus, it was all "no, no, no, don't do it." Yet, maybe this was exactly the reaction Chapter 7 was made to provoke. It didn't feel like a backdoor pilot to me (it would have, if I had watched the episodes one at a time), and if it was, I certainly would not want to see that show. But that is besides the point. That chapter is all about the road not taken, the Darth Vader that could resist the dark side. From that standpoint it made sense that it was the only one directed by Rebecca Thomas (whose ELECTRICK CHILDREN I now want to see) and had a different visual look.

After all, Eleven finds herself in an environment that remains stranger to her than Hawkins even after she found "friends" (I could very much relate to that part of it). The channel-your-anger-and-find-yourself-clichés as well as the fashion-mag-punk caricatures aside, there was enough interesting material in that trip down the rabbit hole: STRANGER THINGS is so emotionally rewarding because all the characters at some point can share their emotional turmoil, fears and insecurities with someone. Yet, however Mike and Hopper love Eleven, they will never know what it was like to grow up as a lab rat with a father like Brenner. So I found it a relief that she could share those memories with someone with a similar background, even if Kali (Linnea Berthelsen succeeded in transforming a plot device into a real character) ultimately pursued a different agenda.

It is true that there could have been a way for Eleven to confront her childhood self-defence killings and put them into context of a revenge mission. But the most emotionally draining moment for me was Eleven's confrontation with Kali's Brenner projection. Before, Modine was just the onedimensional blond villain type, but here it actually struck me how confusing it must be to call someone like that Papa.

While some have argued that the block construction of Chapter 7 broke the notion of one 7.5-hour-movie, I think that exactly because the show is conceived as one long film (binge-watching is encouraged), "The Lost Sister" works as a side story. Besides, one of the joys of the long form is that structurally, it resembles novels more closely than three-act films. And side stories or even embedded stories that take up considerable portions of a book are not uncommon.

But I certainly agree that leaving the escalating tension in Hawkins suspended for more than 50 minutes seems to overspend the bow since it cannot match the intensity of the Andrew-Stanton-chapters. And of course, if you are only interested in what happens to the guys in the lab, then Chapter 7 is breaking the perfectly built pace considerably instead of just delaying the showdown for a bit too long.

Two things I might want to study more closely:
1) Although I am not really comfortable with the concept of having some episodes done by different directors if a show is so clearly designed as one consistent movie, I thought that Andrew Stanton's direction of chapters five and six was outstanding. Would be interesting to also look at the writing by Jessie Nickson-Lopez and Kate Trefry.
2) During STRANGER THINGS 2 I found proof for something that occured to me a few years ago while studying suspense techniques: the most thrilling moments that are usually credited to twists are not the twists or revelations themselves but the moment when the character on screen realizes the very thing we wanted to tell him so badly. This works if we know something for several hours before the character discovers it (the truth about Eleven's mother, Hopper having lost his daughter) as well as if we only learn about it minutes before the character finds it out. And STRANGER THINGS 2, like Harry Potter and most thrillers or comedies that lets us share more than one perspective seems to have an abundance of these "realizing moments".

Musical Patterns in the Films of Christopher Nolan

$
0
0
Never say never... There were three filmmakers (Christopher Nolan, Stanley Kubrick, Wes Anderson) I vowed never to do a video essay about - not because I wouldn't admire them, on the contrary, but because there is already much too much out there about their work. And now, there are only two (I don't plan to break the promise on Kubrick and Anderson anytime soon). Since this video already had more positive feedback than anything else I made, I can't say it was a bad decision. Right now I am working on a video about some aspects of the synth score of STRANGER THINGS 1. But after that, I will return to Nolan because I still got a broadly outlined essay on some of his more unobtrusive crosscutting techniques waiting to be finished.


Music in Nolan's Films
Christopher Nolan strives to make his films the most immersive experience possible. So he prefers the score to support the atmosphere and the pace of his films and not elicit emotions by way of sentimental melodies. While this is very obvious in DUNKIRK (2017), Hans Zimmer's lauded score follows some of the same basic patterns that can be found in all of Nolan's prior films - regardless of the composer. He even said that it basically "is Chris Nolan’s score" (nytimes.com/2017/07/26/movies/the-secrets-of-the-dunkirk-score-christopher-nolan.html).

So here is a tour d'horizon on these musical patterns and their evolution from FOLLOWING (1998) to INTERSTELLAR (2014). Of course, this is only a broad, subjective overview. It is impossible to do justice to the many complexities of each individual score within 10 minutes. Make sure to watch it full screen and loud (preferably on head phones)!

For educational purposes only!

German version for filmbulletin.ch: vimeo.com/239957027

Favorite Films of 2017

$
0
0
At last, in 2017 I have managed to see more films in cinemas than at home. But what used to be "normal" up until three years ago was now only possible because I saw a record 43 films/screenings at the festivals of Annecy, Locarno and Fantoche. So here is a roundup of films and tv shows that left a lasting impression or stood out to me for some other reason.

Color comparison from an introduction to MOONLIGHT

Favorite New Releases
Film of the year is definitely Barry Jenkins'MOONLIGHT (2016), a transcendent cinematic poem that engaged me on so many levels that it remains vividly present in my mind even after almost a year. 

My favorite dozen of 2017(in alphabetical order)
Note: As usual, my list includes several 2016 films that did not come out in Switzerland until 2017. 
  • AMERICAN HONEY (Arnold 2016): A lens-flare-heavy first person account of a "mag crew" road trip with a stellar ensemble of mostly first-timers grounded in realism and keen observation. Even within a deliberately meandering plot, Andrea Arnold creates one tense scene after another. Besides, AMERICAN HONEY contains probably the most accurate depiction of what it feels like to travel in a minivan with a group of friends.
  • BABY DRIVER (Wright 2017): It may not be Edgar Wright's masterpiece - HOT FUZZ (2007) still occupies that spot - but it has sure got rhythm. And a distinctive rhythm - slow or fast, in dialogue, performance and/or editing, with or without music - is probably the one thing I intuitively value most in a film. So if someone succeeds in pulling off an intertextual plot full of practical car chases based on and choreographed to an ipod playlist, I cannot resist.
  • BLADE RUNNER 2049 (Villeneuve 2017): While further developing the themes of Ridley Scott's original film, Denis Villeneuve's belated sequel appeared more streamlined to me. Yet, with self-confident direction, audiovisual grandeur and perfect pacing BLADE RUNNER 2049 in Dolby 3D and Atmos completely blew me away.
  • CALL ME BY YOUR NAME (Guadagnino 2017): Had it not been for Michael Stuhlbarg's final speech, I would have written this off as another subtly acted but lighthearted summer romance full of beautiful people. However, in those last few minutes, Guadagnino's film reveals an emotional depth that resonates far beyond the love-affair.
  • HAPPY END (Haneke 2017): I seldom find myself chuckling in a film by Michael Haneke. But in his underrated family drama with a cellphone-filming protagonist that reminded me of BENNY'S VIDEO (1992) and a series of erratic set-pieces, there is a hint of humour (and warmth) beneath the well-meaning family members' devastating inability to do the right thing.
  • JACKIE (Larrain 2016): Thanks to the seamless integration of recreated and historical footage, grainy 16mm wide-angle closeups, Natalie Portman's masterful performance and Mica Levi's excellent music, I liked Pablo Larrain's complex, nonlinear, ambivalent portrait of a woman trying to shape her husband's legacy even more than his magical realist take on NERUDA (2016, they both came out within weeks in Switzerland).
  • LADY MACBETH (Oldroyd 2016): Suspense with almost no music and a commanding break-out performance by Florence Pugh dominate that short but concise and visually rigorous literary adaptation. In contrast to Sophia Coppola's equally atmospheric but bloodless THE BEGUILED, LADY MACBETH had me at the edge of my seat the whole time.
  • MANCHESTER BY THE SEA (Lonergan 2016): Told in organically flowing flashbacks partly built around elaborate pieces of extradiegetic music, MANCHESTER BY THE SEA variegates the highly conventional "overcoming a back-story wound" plot by gently revealing that there may not be a catharsis for everyone. Director Lonergan propels Michelle Williams and Casey Affleck to career highs (it certainly didn't need a Matthew Broderick cameo, but that's a very minor quibble).
  • PADDINGTON 2 (King 2017): Easily the most emotionally rewarding escapist fantasy of the year. I even liked it better than the first one. I particularly enjoyed the Chaplinesque sense of humour and sentimentality, the references to the original Paddington stories and the 1975 TV series, the performances (including the animated protagonist), the overall storybook feel and faux Wes Anderson setting, the camera twirls and the fantastic color design. (It just puzzles me why anyone would hire a great composer like Dario Marianelli if they wanted him to mechanically recompose the Desplat-Anderson tracks that were so obviously used as temp music?)
  • THE HANDMAIDEN (Park 2017): If somebody asked me what "sensual pleasure" meant, I'd just show them this Korean adaptation of a British novel. As usual with Park Chan-Wook's thrillers, nothing is what it seems, but this time, the ultra violence is kept to a minimum. Now, I'm looking forward to revel in the "Extended Cut".
  • THE SQUARE (Östlund 2017): A long anticipated elaboration on the complex moral themes of Östlund's provocative PLAY (2011), the less austere SQUARE also works as a hilarious satire on the art scene. Despite a running time of 145 minutes it never drags. 
MOONLIGHT in the context of Wong Kar-Wai.


Outstanding feature films that were not released in Swiss cinemas
  • A QUIET PASSION(Davies 2016):With its highly stylized staging, crystal clear cinematography, atypically clean sets, an incredibly strong and witty script, a deeply moving performance by Cynthia Nixonand probably the first positive father figure in any Terence Davies film, this Emily Dickinson biopic is a must-see for anyone even remotely interested in American poetry.
  • MUDBOUND (Rees 2017): Forsaking the color explosion of her first feature PARIAH (2011) in favor of dark and dreary earthtones, Dee Rees unhurriedly reveals the hardship of two families whose fate is deeply entwined in this multi-perspective Southern epic. Mary J. Blige and Carey Mulligan stand out in a strong ensemble. The ending felt a bit too uplifting for my taste.
  • FIRST THEY KILLED MY FATHER (Jolie 2017): Directed with a strong sense for visual consistency and the unassuming narrative point of view of a young Cambodian girl, Angelina Jolie's Netflix production never tries to infuse the girl's horrible odyssey with a fake purpose or pathetic sentimentality. And although everyone is beautiful and the cinematography rivals Malick's most vivid nature excesses, Jolie manages to disappear behind the story that - again - ends unexpectedly upbeat (maybe this is a staple of Netflix originals?).
MOONLIGHT: Different impact of production still (long lens, above water) vs film frame (short lens, sea level)


Realism, arthouse violence and killer soundtracks
Farhadi'sFORUSHANDE (THE SALESMAN) did not make my list because although it is a tense and complex film it did not captivate me the way his earlier works did. Similarly, the social realism of GOD'S OWN COUNTRY (Francis Lee) and THE WOUND(INXEBA,John Trengove) felt rough and fresh, but neither of them stayed on my mind for too long. 

However, I tremendously liked Lynne Ramsay'sYOU WERE NEVER REALLY HERE. Despite its flawless visual storytelling, it felt like it had been cut short by about half an hour of story material. The excellent music and sound design are certainly worth studying, though. The same goes for three much maligned supernatural arthouse thrillers that I enjoyed regardless of plotholes, absurd premises or heavy-handed symbolism: Lanthimos' Kubrickian take on "Iphigenia in Aulis" (THE KILLING OF A SACRED DEER), Ozon's DePalma/Cronenberg inspired twins fantasy L'AMANT DOUBLE and, last but not least, Aronofsky's hilarious satire MOTHER! that came almost uncomfortably close to the way I perceive/remember nightmares.


Introduction to a children's screening of CARS 3
LOVING VINCENT
Artists and animation
Among the usual batch of artist/painter biopics (an mainstream arthouse staple now in the same way as superhero movies are for multiplexes: in-built audience, established brand, unsatisfying products), I have had a closer look at 1) the book-to-screen translation of Tucci's entertaining but mediocre FINAL PORTRAIT and 2) the fascinating if misguided rotoscoping experiment that is LOVING VINCENT (Kobiela/Welchman). InAnnecy, I was also introduced to the universe of Masaaki Yuasa - a previous blindspot - in a screening of the strangely uneven but highly enjoyable LU OVER THE WALL

But Annecy 2017 also felt like a watershed moment for my excitement for Pixar films: for the first time, their highly anticipated presentations (this time COCO, LOU, CARS 3) left me completely unimpressed. While I liked the short film LOU, the COCO stuff felt so uninspired (KUBO, anyone?) and "clever" by the numbers, that I was only relieved when I saw the actual film months later and found it to have a more interesting emotional core than the hyperactive first half suggested (if only someone had pulled the plug on that FROZEN featurette that preceded it). 

My favorite animated features of 2017 were LE GRAND MÉCHANT RENARD (Renner/Imbert) and IN THIS CORNER OF THE WORLD (Sunao Katabuchi) both of which I saw at Fantoche in Baden (CH). Unfortunately, they won't be released theatrically in the German part of Switzerland.


Comparison of characters by Claude Barras for an introduction to MA VIE DE COURGETTE.

Memorable events
At Fantoche I also attended a masterclass by Michael Dudok de Wit about the making of THE RED TURTLE. The three and a half fascinating hours flew by so quickly, though, that the filmmaker's insightful reflections on film making, animation and life had to be cut short because of the next screening. 

But the most important event for me this year was clearly thevideo essay roundtable at the Locarno International Festival where I got the opportunity to meet Catherine Grant, Kevin B. Lee, Chiara Grizzaffi and many other interesting video essayists and scholars. Thanks to Christopher Small I even got to shake hands with Todd Haynes who is not only one of my favorite filmmakers but also an articulate film scholar. In Locarno, I also attended a special screening of the academic project PER UNA CONTROSTORIA DEL CINEMA ITALIANO by filmidee, a compilation of lively video essays that aim to tell an alternative Italian film history. As much as I know, CONTROSTORIA is currently in the festival circuit but will probably become available online eventually.

Although cinema attendance is alarmingly waning (at least beyond tent pole franchises) I saw the opening of three expensive new cinema complexes this year (PalaCinema in Locarno, Kosmos in Zürich, Pathé in Ebikon). Kosmos is already one of my favorite cinemas and thanks to the (rather uninviting) Pathé, there is now an IMAX 3D with laser projection within half an hour of my home. Hence, that's where I went to see THE LAST JEDI which I enjoyed much more than I had expected. Rian Johnson seems to be the right guy in the right place: there were so many things this new film got right that I did not even mind the cg creatures or some clunky bits here and there. THE LAST JEDI and Soderbergh's LOGAN LUCKY also reminded me that Adam Driver is one of the best actors of his generation.
The "Edgar Wright Wipe" transition from an introduction to BABY DRIVER.

Retrospectives
Ten favorite older films I have seen for the first time in 2017
(all of them highly recommended)
  • SUNRISE (W.F. Murnau 1927)
  • STALAG 17 (Billy Wilder 1953)
  • HINTER DEN SIEBEN GLEISEN (Kurt Früh 1959)
  • STAND BY ME (Rob Reiner 1986)
  • MALCOLM X (Spike Lee 1992)
  • LUNDI MATIN (Otar Iosseliani 2002)
  • PLAY (Ruben Östlund 2011)
  • HER (Spike Jonze 2013)
  • O MENINO E O MUNDO (Alé Abreu 2013)
  • BANDE DE FILLES (Céline Sciamma 2014)

Music scenes in films that inspired MOONLIGHT.
Private retrospectives
Research for introductions, articles or video essays always serves as a pretext for seeing or re-evaluating tons of films. In connection with MOONLIGHT, for example, I realized that both THREE TIMES (Hou 2005) and KILLER OF SHEEP(Burnett 1978) feature some of my favorite music scenes (I use "music scene" for sequences in which a song takes central stage while the characters merely react to it).

Not all of the films I try to see are "good" and I don't even have to like them as long as I find something interesting regarding the subject I am studying. There is the occasional disappointment, of course, like the one Jacques Demy musical I have been wanting to see for years - PEAU D'ANE - that turned out to be really awful. On the other hand, CLEO DE 5 A 7 by Demy's wife Agnes Varda was a lot more entertaining than I had imagined.

From a lecture on DUNKIRK.
Even without an external reason I prefer to see films within some sort of context (if I can't see them in a cinema, that is). Over the past months, I have looked at three Andrea Arnold features (I now wish she would make a full musical) and tried to catch up with a bunch of independent vampire and horror movies I had missed in theaters - basically everything from THIRST (Park 2009 [the strangest Emile Zola adaptation]) and THE BABADOOK (Kent 2014 [creepy and fresh]) to THE GIRL WALKS HOME ALONE AT NIGHT (Amirpour 2014 [incredibly stylish but left me cold]) and IT FOLLOWS (Mitchell 2014 [I loved it]).

In the middle of that series, I saw GET OUT (Peele 2017) which I liked for its satirical content. Unfortunately, most of the horror scenes were ruined by a group of obnoxiously distracting audience members (if only Catherine Keener had hypnotized them!).

Netflix
That certainly never happens during late night Netflix sessions where I caught Justin Simien's multi-perspective update of DEAR WHITE PEOPLE that was both hilariously funny and occasionally poignant (especially in chapter V directed by Barry Jenkins). My favorite among the few "cinematic/quality" sitcoms I have seen so far is Spike Lee's ten part reworking of SHE'S GOTTA HAVE IT, though. Like Aziz Ansari in the second season of MASTER OF NONE, Lee and his writing team use the long form storytelling format as a playground. Not everything works equally well, but thanks to DeWanda Wise's wonderful performance I was able to empathize with Nola Darling even when I didn't like a controversial or outright bad decision. Besides, I like to be challenged by Lee's often polemic but complex storytelling.
Stills from a video essay on the music of STRANGER THINGS
Now-memories
To be honest, I would not have seen any of those tv series had I not waited so long for a STRANGER THINGS blu-ray that I finally decided to renew my Netflix subscription (when it first came to Switzerland I paid for a whole year without finding one single film I was looking for, so I canceled it). That I liked the Duffer Brothers' sincere take on intertextual 1980s escapist nostalgia is a mere understatement. So although I came late to the party, waiting until Halloween for the "sequel" was quite an ordeal. Thankfully, Season 2 met and even exceeded my expectations. I especially liked the father-daughter relationship between Hopper and Eleven. What's more, seeing Dustin with Dart somehow enabled me to see the STAR WARS movies through the eyes of a twelve-year old boy again (maybe that's why I even liked - well, not the Ewoks, but - the Porgs). STRANGER THINGS is so far the only mini-series that felt like a movie to me (including the controversial "Darth Vader" chapter in the sequel). Nevertheless, because of the format it was devised for I do not include it into my list of favorite movies.

The abundance of young acting talents in MOONLIGHT and STRANGER THINGSprompted me to compile a list of breakout performances by young actors:
(titles alphabetically, some from 2016 that I could only see in 2017 because of distribution delays)
  • 13 REASONS WHY: Alisha Boe (Jessica), Kathrine Langston (Hannah)
  • AMERICAN HONEY: Sasha Lane (Star)
  • BLUE MY MIND*: Luna Wedler (Mia), Zoe Pastell Holthuisen (Gianna)
  • FIRST THEY KILLED MY FATHER: Sareum Srey Moch (Loung)
  • IT: Jaeden Lieberher (Bill), Jeremy Ray Taylor (Ben), Sophia Lillis (Beverly)
  • LADY MACBETH: Florence Pugh (Katherine)
  • MOONLIGHT:Alex Hibbert / Ashton Sanders / Trevante Rhodes (Chiron)
  • PATTI CAKE$: Danielle Macdonald (Patti)
  • SAMI BLOOD: Lene Cecilia Sparrok (Elle Marja)
  • SHE'S GOTTA HAVE IT: DeWanda Wise (Nola)
  • STRANGER THINGS 2**: Priah Ferguson (Lucas' scene stealing sister Erica!)
  • THE KILLING OF A SACRED DEER / DUNKIRK: Barry Keoghan (Martin / George)
  • THE HANDMAIDEN: Tae-Ri Kim (Sook-Hee)
  • GRAVE/TIGER GIRL: Ella Rumpf*** (Alexia/Tiger)
  • WONDERSTRUCK: Millicent Simmonds (Rose)
* Lisa Brühlmann's BLUE MY MIND was my favorite Swiss film this year. It was not perfect, but fresh, emotionally sincere and managed to integrate its fantasy aspects organically into a coming-of-age story.
** Since Millie Bobby Brown and Finn Wolfhard have already become household names after the first season I do not include them here.
*** within Switzerland, her breakout performance was in CHRIEG (Jaquemet, 2014).

The prize for most memorable love couple goes to Ruth Negga and Joel Edgerton in Jeff Nichols'LOVING.

Complementary colors in the PADDINGTON movies.
With THE FLORIDA PROJECT, LADY BIRD, PHANTOM THREAD, THE SHAPE OF WATER, BPM, THE POST, THREE BILLBOARDS OUTSIDE EBBING, MISSOURI and RADIANCE already on the horizon, I am looking forward to a promising 2018.

Resolutions for 2018:
1) Make a list of every video essay I watch. It might come in handy one day... (with a field as vast as video essays I should have done that for years)
2) Complete at least half the video essays and blog posts I am working on. Find a way to make that video on color in PARIAH, at last.
3) Find a steady job in academia or some other sort of teaching environment.

ISLE OF DOGS Exhibition in London

$
0
0
The three quarter view we never get in an Anderson film.
If you happen to be in London, try to squeeze in a visit to The Store, 180 The Strand to see and feel the sets of Wes Anderson's glorious new stop motion feature ISLE OF DOGS from a different perspective. The exhibition is free, so even if you don't have enough time to really dive into it, have a look at it.

During the ten minutes I had in there, I tried to take a few pictures that open up an alternative view on the familiarly flat Wes Anderson signature shots: three quarter views and a stereoscopic image to see what the scientists' set looks like in 3D (which obviously goes very much against the grain of Anderson's style but is great fun).

See it in 3D! Propably best viewed on a cellphone.
And that's how the lighting effects in the tunnel were achieved.

That's an advertising campaign I like!



10 Years of Blogging and 30 Years of Fireflies

$
0
0
I've just realized that I started this blog ten years ago! The very first post appeared April 9, 2008. I have certainly been more productive during the first half of this decade. Nevertheless, colorful animation expressions (despite its overlong name) is still active.

So in order to commemorate the anniversary, here are some reconstructed pan backgrounds from my favorite film by Takahata Isao who sadly passed away on April 5, 2018 at the age of 82. Co-incidentally, HOTARU NO HAKA (GRAVE OF THE FIREFLIES) was originally released almost exactly 30 years ago in Japan (April 16, 1988).

I was particularly interested in those backgrounds that are revealed by autonomous camera movements that do not follow the movement of a character on screen (there is one of those as you can see below).

Click to enlarge!


In this one I have recreated a "standard" pan where the camera follows the characters across a background.









All backgrounds reconstructed from screengrabs taken off the GRAVE OF THE FIREFLIES blu-ray for study purposes only.

The Colors of GRAVE OF THE FIREFLIES

$
0
0
About two weeks ago, I completed the following video essay on colors as a storytelling tool in GRAVE OF THE FIREFLIES (HOTARU NO HAKA, Takahata, 1988):

Video Essay: The Colors of GRAVE OF THE FIREFLIES from Oswald Iten on Vimeo.

In my opinion, FIREFLIES is a prime example of how naturalistic colors are organized into restricted concepts that help "make the film more easily understood" (to quote character color stylist Yasuda Michiyo). It's also a testament to the collaboration of Yasuda and art director/background painter Yamamoto Nizo.

This color analysis is based on the official Blu ray transfer, i.e. a stellar digital restoration which - for several reasons - may or may not replicate the exact colors of an original 35mm print from 1988.
If you look at the comparison below, it becomes pretty obvious how much detail was lost by pushing saturation and contrast for the earlier DVD transfer. A lot of these "simplifications" may be due to the nature of NTSC which was a color system vastly inferior both to 35mm and high definition.
But the overall impression is also a lot warmer, lumping soft shades of olive and green into reddish browns which works against the overall color schemes.

left: Blu-ray                                           right: NTSC DVD
Dark areas are completely drowned in the old transfer, while subtleties in saturation are also lost.


One of the reasons I like the film so much lies in the ambivalent but empathetic portrayal of its protagonist. Takahata's film is based on a semi-autobiographical novel by Nosaka Akiyuki who felt responsible for his sister's death during World War II. On the one hand, fourteen year old Seita is repeatedly shown taking care of his sister in the most affectionate way so that we strongly sympathize with the two children. On the other hand however, he also stubbornly refuses to contribute to the community. And it's not just his aunt who accuses him of being lazy, the staging of many a scene suggests the same, as you can see below:

Animation for Triag International

$
0
0

I have recently had the opportunity to work on this advertisement for a modular workholding system for CNC machines. Concept and 3D-models of tools by TRIAG International. I did the character design (loosely based on a photo of a toy t-rex) and all the animation.

Sound Effects in David Lean's Cineguild Features

$
0
0
Over the past few months, I have kept myself busy analyzing several aspects of two of my favorite David Lean films: THE PASSIONATE FRIENDS (1949) and BRIEF ENCOUNTER (1945).

In two video essays, I focus primarily on how the film makers utilized diegetic sounds (other than source music) as storytelling devices. Since it will take some time until the second video (about the use of "silence" in THE PASSIONATE FRIENDS) will be ready, I have decided to publish them separately. So here is the first one:


Melodramatic Railway Sounds - Video Essay from Oswald Iten on Vimeo.


Description: Analysis of the narrative functions that diegetic sound effects assume in BRIEF ENCOUNTER (1945).

The richly layered sound tracks of David Lean's Cineguild films of the 1940s are a real treat for anyone who appreciates sophisticated sound design (avant la lettre, of course). Although BRIEF ENCOUNTER is predominantly told from the protagonist's subjective perspective, all the sound effects are strictly diegetical (meaning that all sounds can be attributed to a source within the narrative world).

Off-screen sounds of bells, whistles and trains both open up the visible space and work as interruptions or alerts that determine the characters' actions.

But the railway sounds also form sort of an alternative score (to the dominant Rachmaninoff concerto) that comments on the action and helps express the protagonist's emotional state.

Note: This video essay utilizes excerpts from David Lean's BRIEF ENCOUNTER (1945) under the guidelines of fair use for analytical and educational purposes only.

Looking in the Rearview Mirror - Favorite Films of 2018

$
0
0
HEREDITARY
There is one moment from the first half of HEREDITARY that ingrained itself deeply into my mind. Not wanting to believe what just happened (my own initial reaction was "have I really just seen that?"), the protagonist at the same time wants to look in the rearview mirror but is afraid of what he is going to see. 

During these few seconds I felt thatthe film looked back at me: this duality of wanting to see and being afraid of what I am going to see reflected not only my own position as viewer of a horror film but also the audience's inability to interfere with the action on the screen - an inability which in itself is the basis of suspense and, more generally, of one-way storytelling (in contrast to interactive storytelling like BANDERSNATCH, but that's another story).

With that out of the way, in this post I am looking in the rearview mirror that reflects 2018. More than anything else, I consider end of year lists an opportunity to organize the glorious mess of cinematic impressions floating through my mind. I start with the usual list of favorite films (those that impressed me the most) followed by a discussion of my year in film beyond that list.

Favorite New Releases
Film of the year goes ex aequo to Paul Thomas Anderson'sPHANTOM THREADand Alfonso Cuarón'sROMA, both of which were shot by the auteurs themselves (coached and assisted by long standing crew members) because their frequent cinematographers Robert Elswitt and Emmanuel Lubezki, respectively, weren't available.

PHANTOM THREAD (Lesley Manville) / REBECCA (J. Anderson) / ROMA (Yalitza Aparicio)
  • PHANTOM THREAD: Like most of PTA's films, this dreamlike time capsule of 1950s London (engulfed in one of the best piano-and-strings scores in years) is about toxic masculinity and a mentor relationship. In this revisionist reworking of classics like REBECCA (1940), however, the power struggle is between a man and two women magnificently portrayed by Vicky Krieps, Daniel Day Lewis and Lesley Manville.
  • ROMA: It's rare that a filmmaker's autobiographical magnum opus turns out to be their best film. But Cuarón pulls it off with his black and white memory snapshot of day-to-day life in Mexico City in 1970/71 mainly because we see everything from the perspective of an indigenous domestic help (in distant long shots, not close-ups). Slowly floating vistas, fragmented images and an immersive soundscape produce a flawless rhythm with an increasing emotional tension over two hours. 

Ten favorites of 2018 (in alphabetical order):
Note: My list includes several 2017 films that came out in Switzerland in 2018. I have seen all of them on the big screen.
  • CE MAGNIFIQUE GATEAU*: Although technically a short film (44 min), Marc James Roels and Emma de Swaef's stop motion anthology about Belgian colonialism was certainly the most memorable animated feature I have seen this year. Tactile felt puppets in five surreal, slow-paced, loosely interwoven segments add up to an strangely funny, melancholic and beautiful trip down the rabbit hole. 
  • CHRIS THE SWISS*: In this dense animated documentary, director Anja Kofmel investigates the death of her older cousin, a Swiss journalist who died in Croatia in 1992 wearing the uniform of a paramilitary group. Black and white animation expertly visualizes the missing and therefore imagined parts of a story that is personal and universal at the same time. 
COLD WAR
  • COLD WAR: Stylistically exploring the specific potential of the black and white Academy format, Pawlikowski's fictional retelling of his parents' love story is so concisely written that it manages to compress 15 years of an on-and-off relationship into 84 minutes of rigid musical vignettes that reflect the shifting political and cultural climate.
  • THE FLORIDA PROJECT: Sensitively filtered through the eyes and mindset of a little girl, Sean Baker's portrayal of long time motel residents (an ensemble of first-timers, people playing themselves and a few professionals) in Florida transforms harsh realism into a funny, touching, colorful cinemascope adventure that echoes key ingredients of the unattainable Disney parks nearby.
  • GIRL: Lukas Dhont's physical but delicate portrait of aspiring trans-gender ballerina Lara stood out among the many recent coming-of-age stories concerned with gender identity because of Victor Polster's incredible performance and Dhont's ability to infuse the (mostly benevolent) adult characters (even those in only one scene) with life. 
I, TONYA
  • I, TONYA: Expecting just another "inspired by a true story" yarn I was genuinely suprised by Craig Gillespie's playful approach to subjectivity and self-reflection, addressing the film's making fun of lower-class characters and then shaking it up once more during the credits. I love films that provoke laughter that gets caught in the throat. 
  • LADYBIRD*: High expectations often lead to disappointment, especially when glowing reviews precede a cinema release by half a year. Not in this case, however. In Greta Gerwig's crisp take on a mother-daughter-relationship, everything (including the Sondheim tunes) just falls into place organically without getting fancy. 
SHOPLIFTERS
  • SHOPLIFTERS: Unbiased, warm, sentimental, aching, beautiful, thought provoking -  Kore-eda's unassuming masterpieces provides no easy answers but speaks to the heart and the mind alike. Although the director's perspective in examing family relationships has lately shifted towards grown-up characters, SHOPLIFTERS nevertheless begins and ends on close-ups of children's faces. But in between there are countless group shots that visually reflect the dynamic relationship of six non-blood-related characters in the same frame.
    YOU WERE NEVER REALLY HERE
  • THE RIDER*: Somewhere in the middle of Chloé Zhao's empathetic look at life in a South Dakota reservation, there is a series of long hand held telephoto shots depicting a young rodeo rider taming a horse. For me, this moment epitomized the magic of filmic authenticity - cinema vérité - and I didn't even know that the actor was basically playing himself.
  • YOU WERE NEVER REALLY HERE*: As I have written last year, I liked Lynne Ramsay's"action film without action" right away, but only when I saw it again during its regular cinema run, I realized what a thorougly great film it is. Expertly compressed storytelling, very musical and sometimes just pure cinema.

Two favorites that didn't get a cinema release in Switzerland (in alphabetical order):
  • A GHOST STORY:
    A GHOST STORY
    Between crafting one of the few decent Disney remakes and lovingly reconstructing the late 1970s for Robert Redford's acting swan song, David Lowery released this radical meditation from the perspective of a mute ghost which resonated strongly with me.
     
  • SHIRKERS*: This autobiographical documentary about the making of a literally stolen personal film project turns into a sensitive empowerment story overshadowed by an ominous man whose haunting presence also makes it one of the year's best horror movies.
First impressions
There are two films I definitely want to revisit when they are released in January/February 2019. Although on the surface, these films couldn't be any more different from each other, they are both very physical and told from the perspective of female characters but directed by men:
  • IF BEALE STREET COULD TALK: It's almost impossible for Barry Jenkins to live up to post-MOONLIGHT expectations, especially with an "important" (but never bloated) film that was conceived years ago and  hints at similar cinematic inspirations (KILLER OF SHEEP 1978, IN THE MOOD FOR LOVE 2000). Ironically in the age of TV drama, voice-over narration and a non-chronological plot make BEALE STREET feel more conventional than MOONLIGHT with its radical division into three self-contained snapshots and the protagonist's inability to articulate. But Jenkins' faithful stream-of-consciousness adaptation has an irresistible musical flow to it and is full of wonderful performances. Most importantly, it made me discover and become a fan of James Baldwin's outstanding fictional writing. 
  • THE FAVOURITE: Allegedly turning towards "mainstream" (honestly, I doubt that), Yorgos Lanthimos finds his latest huis-clos scenario in the court of gout-ridden Queen Anne. Like a spiced-up version of LOVE & FRIENDSHIP (2016), THE FAVOURITE is incredibly entertaining without hiding the darker consequences of ivory-tower power play and mutual exploitation. I really hope that Olivia Colman will finally get the recognition she deserves thanks to this film.
IF BEALE STREET COULD TALK (KiKi Layne) / THE FAVOURITE (Olivia Colman)


Looking at the titles above, in 2018 I seem to have gravitated towards autobiographical (fictionalized or documentary) and slice of life narratives. Interestingly, the two films about substitute families feature a memorable beach scene (happiness in SHOPLIFTERS, turmoil in ROMA). Furthermore, ROMA, GHOST STORY, GIRL, YOU WERE NEVER REALLY HERE and to some degree THE FLORIDA PROJECT, THE RIDER and CE MAGNIFIQUE GATEAU are about protagonists that are not really articulate (as opposed to verbally dexterous characters like Tish in BEALE STREET) but have an audiovisual "voice" of their own because their films show the world from their perspective - which is something I value greatly in movies.

Furthermore, 9 of the 16 films above have female protagonists (if you count PHANTOM THREAD, it's an even 10) and 6 were directed by women(marked *). The same goes for two girl-centered stories that almost made the list: LEAVE NO TRACE* by Debra Granik and ESTIU 1993* by Carla Simon. Among the films that stayed on my mind for quite some time were Andrey Zvyagintsev's chilling LOVELESS (especially the mother's devastating breakdown near the end) as well as IN THE AISLES (IN DEN GÄNGEN, Thomas Stuber) and TRANSIT (Christian Petzold) both starring Franz Rogowski (a "German Joaquin Phoenix").

Based on breakout performances in movies I have seen in 2018 (TV shows not included), my list of actors to watch includes only two men:
clockwise: Andrea Berntzen / John David Washington / Alba August / Cynthia Erivo

  • Alba August (ASTRID)
  • Andrea Berntzen (UTOYA 22. JULI)
  • Jessie Buckley (BEAST)
  • Cynthia Erivo (BAD TIMES AT THE EL ROYALE)
  • Halldóra Geirhardsdóttir (WOMAN AT WAR)
  • KiKi Layne (IF BEALE STREET COULD TALK)
  • Victor Polster (GIRL)
  • Brooklynn Prince (THE FLORIDA PROJECT)
  • Bria Vinaite (THE FLORIDA PROJECT)
  • John David Washington (BLACKkKLANSMAN)

General Observations
Found Footage and Closure
Seeing Sandi Tan's SHIRKERS, Morgen Brett'sJANE, Orson Welles' THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WIND and Morgan Neville's hagiographic THEY'LL LOVE ME WHEN I'M DEAD about the making of THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WIND more or less back to back, sparked some interesting observations about how filmmakers present themselves and their subjects. All of these fascinating documentary and essay films are about the making of a film the fragments of which make up large parts of what we see on screen. And to some degree, all of them reflect on their own construction and filmmaking in general.

Both SHIRKERS and JANE rely heavily on recently rediscovered silent footage. But while Sandi Tan preserves the oneiric quality of her "lost" feature by keeping it mute, Morgen Brett shapes Hugo van Lawick's groundbreaking footage of chimpanzees into an immersive experience by way of contemporary editing techniques, oversaturated colors and a hyper-realistic soundtrack (at times, the rhythmic Chimp noises reminded me of Disney's True Life Adventures).

Brett also freely employs aspect ratios and black and white for structuring purposes rather than imitating historical conventions. In a similar way, THEY'LL LOVE ME adopts some of the techniques that Orson Welles himself used in his essay film F FOR FAKE (1973). As a companion piece to the carefully restored THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WIND (a gloriously engaging train wreck) it works both as an introduction and an addendum, but unfortunately, it doesn't dig deep enough into Oja Kodar's role in the whole process.

At times, the sensory overload in all four of those filmstended to overwhelm me rather than allowing for real immersion (while animated diaries and scribbles work well in JANE and SHIRKERS, the animation is hardly more than a gimmick when compared to the depth it provides in CHRIS THE SWISS). Avoiding oppressive editing and music, Yance Ford's STRONG ISLANDfelt like a welcome antidote to the antsy activisim of so many TV documentaries.

Like CHRIS THE SWISS, SHIRKERS, OTHER SIDE/THEY'LL LOVE ME, Ford's poignant investigation is really about finding closure in the process of making a film. I was again reminded of STRONG ISLAND, when I saw the Danish thriller THE GUILTY (DEN SKYLDIGE, Gustav Möller) that consists almost entirely of phone conversations. Both films open with a phone conversation, both force us to reconstruct the central incident in our imagination and both confront us with how hastily we evaluate situations on the basis of deep-rooted prejudices.

True Stories and Long Takes
Among the "based on a true story" fiction films, MIDNIGHT RUNNER (DER LÄUFER, Hannes Baumgartner) stood out to me because it manages to tell a character study from the point of view of a contradictory perpetrator without simplifying psychological explanations. The same could be said of the Italian film ON MY SKIN (SULLA MIA PELLE, Alessio Cremonini), only here the protagonist is subjected to unfair treatment. By coincidence, I saw ON MY SKIN within the same 24 hours as Alan Parker'sMIDNIGHT EXPRESS (1978), so that the two Kafkaesque prison films started to interfere with each other in my memory.

Another true-crime re-enactment that still haunts me is Erik Poppe'ssingle take approach to the recent Norwegian tragedy in UTOYA 22. JULI. I am still not convinced that this is a morally justifiable way of "returning the narrative to the victims". But as a suspense thriller, it certainly worked like few other films. At times, it reminded me of the real-time desktop horror film UNFRIENDED (Levan Gabriadze, 2014) that turns into a real nail-biter - provided you allow yourself to accept its outrageously ridiculous premise.

By now, the long take is so ubiquitous - from ROMA to Mike Flanagan's TV adaptation of THE HAUNTING OF HILL HOUSE - that it no longer stands out as a gimmick. More and more filmmakers utilize it in the same unobtrusive way Spielberg has always used it (even in auto-pilot mode like in THE POST): not as a showy "plan séquence" / "oner", but within conventional continuity editing occasionally breaking it up with convenient cutaways and close-ups when necessary.

FIRST MAN
Probably thanks to digital projection and more adventurous TV producers, filmmakers across the board have adopted a much more relaxed attitude towards film and camera formats. Both the 1.37:1 Academy format and Storaro's (and Netflix's) preferred 2.0:1 aspect ratio are not uncommon any more and streaming shows increasingly use different aspect ratios to differentiate parallel timelines (like in THE GRAND BUDAPEST HOTEL, 2014). Moreover, while James Laxton shot the intimate BEALE STREET on the Alexa65 that used to be reserved for epics like THE REVENANT (Iñárritu, 2015), Damien Chazelle and Linus Sandgrenwithhold the advertised IMAX photography until the climax of FIRST MAN, a film otherwise relying on grainy hand-held close-ups. 

Adult Themes and Talking Animals
Unfortunately, the variety of styles currently flourishing in the world of feature animation will hardly reach general audiences around here: Both FUNAN and THE BREADWINNER*, arguably the two most relevant animated features of 2018, are not distributed beyond the festival circuit in Switzerland. Denis Do's autobiographical family drama may be the more important film, but it somehow did not involve me emotionally the way Nora Twomey's colorful Afghan story did. 
FUNAN / THE BREADWINNER
Although I was expecting INCREDIBLES 2 to fall short of the high expectations, Brad Bird's (not entirely original) family-superhero-mashup sequel turned out to be the Pixar equivalent of Christopher Nolan's DARK KNIGHT trilogy: tell your ticking clock story from parallel perspectives of at least five characters (from toddler to single tech nerd), pick up every current political and social topic, add a villain whose philosophy you can agree with up to a certain point, throw in some vigilante justice ideas, deconstruct them, and in doing so present the audience with exactly that kind of spectacle that the movie itself pretends to criticize (only that hilarious BLACK MIRROR episode BANDERSNATCH took that last trick further this year).
THE INCREDIBLES VS INCREDIBLES 2 / BAO (in the middle)
However much I liked INCREDIBLES 2, the real winner was Domee Shi's BAO*: the best Pixar short in years. I was quite surprised by the hullabaloo about people being confused by such a simple but powerful metaphor. I've seen BAO twice with families and even the children seemed to get it.

ISLE OF DOGS
On the talking animals front, I loved Wes Anderson's ISLE OF DOGS (orI LOVE DOGS?) despite wondering why anyone would invent a blonde American exchange student hero and thereby changing the premise that we (as dogs) cannot understand human language to just robbing the Japanese of their voice. Something similar happened with a British hunter (literally telling the audience that Mowgli cannot understand his language) in Andy Serkis' failed MOWGLI (even though Disney had nothing to do with it, "Mow-" still rhymes with "glow" instead of "cow"). Although some gender shake-up would in theory be welcome, we now have two 21st century JUNGLE BOOK adaptations in which the snake of all animals is female - this time transforming into Galadriel the Green.

Memories of LOTR also popped up at the end of a WATERSHIP DOWN episode (Murro et al.) when the camera incongruously flew into some sort of Isengard tower. Anyway, this star-studded new adaptation worked best when I closed my eyes. Apparently, it has become acceptable to apply realistic textures to limited animation even outside the world of video games. While the motion capture performances in MOWGLI exude a certain uncanny valley creepiness, the rabbit animation in WATERSHIP DOWN at times felt more like a distancing art installation (with a very engaging script nonetheless). I am still thankful, though, that Netflix and the BBC believe in animation for adults beyond sitcoms and risqué jokes, at all.

INTO THE SPIDER-VERSE
As far as eye candy goes, I adored the new endearing HILDA series created by Luke Pearson, Kurt Mueller and Stephanie Simpson. And thanks to the trippy color explosion that is INTO THE SPIDER-VERSE (Persichetti/Ramsey/Rothman) I actually enjoyed a superhero blockbuster (needless to say that the moment I like one of these things, it totally bombs at the Swiss box office). Talking of CG pleasures: Spielberg's READY PLAYER ONE may not exactly be the film of the year, but entering the Overlook Hotel in 3Dsure was one of the coolest pop culture moments this year. Last but not least, Genndy Tartakovsky's otherwise forgettable HOTEL TRANSYLVANIA 3 revelled in some genuine cartoon animation poses.


Retrospectives
In 2018, I continued my Varda/Demy selectrospective culminating in a 35mm screening of Agnes Varda's JACQUOT DE NANTES (1991) about the youth of her husband Jacques Demy. Thanks to streaming services, I was also able to catch up onJohn Hughes comedies and hand drawn Dreamworks features in late night sessions. But most of all, I immersed myself into the films of Paul Thomas Anderson, Sean Baker (with a special interest in his editing), early David Lean(sound and music) and Coen Brothers up to THE BIG LEBOWSKI (dialogue, POV, editing patterns) for introductory lectures and video essays (some of which still have not materialized yet).

Of all the older films I have seen for the first time in 2018, these are my favorites (in chronological order):
  • SULLIVAN'S TRAVELS (Sturges, 1941)
  • THE PASSIONATE FRIENDS (Lean, 1949)
  • LA RAGAZZA CON LA VALIGIA (Zurlini, 1961)
  • CRIA CUERVOS (Saura, 1976)
  • BLUE COLLAR (Schrader, 1978)
  • THE WARRIORS (Hill, 1979)
  • FANNY OCH ALEXANDER (Bergman, 1982)
  • DOGTOOTH (Lanthimos, 2009)
  • THE MILL AND THE CROSS (Majewski, 2011)
Images on the right: UNE CHAMBRE EN VILLE (Demy, 1982) / THE MASTER (PTA, 2011) / RAISING ARIZONA (Coens, 1987) / THE PASSIONATE FRIENDS (Lean, 1949).

Recurring motifs in Sean Baker's films.

The colors of Sean Baker.

Warm/cold lighting and echoes in PHANTOM THREAD.

Visual inspiration for THE POST.

Philip Marlowe as a direct predecessor for the Dude.

The rhythm and specificity of Coen dialogue.

The best TV shows I saw in 2018(in chronological order):
    • DER TATORTREINIGER (Arne Feldhusen, 2011-16)
    • BROADCHURCH (Chris Chibnall, 3 seasons 2013-17) 
    • HAPPY VALLEY* (Sally Wainright, 2 seasons 2014-16) 
    • FLEABAG* (Phoebe Waller-Bridge, 2016) 
    • THE END OF THE F***ING WORLD* (Entwistle/Tcherniak/Covell, 2017) 
    • DEAR WHITE PEOPLE VOL.2 (Justin Simien, 2018) 
    • HILDA* (Pearson/Mueller/Simpson, 2018) 
    • HOMECOMING (Esmail/Bloomberg/Horowitz, 2018) 
    • MANIAC (Fukunaga/Somerville, 2018)
    • BLACK MIRROR: BANDERSNATCH (Slade/Brooker, 2018)
    FLEABAG / DER TATORTREINIGER

    * films/shows directed/created by women.


    My Year in Film: 2019 Works

    $
    0
    0
    Since I have not posted anything all year, here is a collection of animated shorts and video essays I made in 2019:


    All animation, no sound: this is my contribution to this year's animated advent calendar curated by Justine Klaiber and Owley Samter.

    For a full blast of clips by Swiss animators, head on over to www.instagram.com/animadvent





    HOLM & Cyrill Lim – Sitting And Waiting (HOLM Remix)
    Composed, Lyrics by Cyrill Lim
    Arranged, Remixed by Daniel Werder
    Music Video Written, Directed and Animated by Oswald Iten
    © Video: Oswald Iten
    ℗ Video: Oswald Iten & Cyrill Lim
    ℗ Audio: Daniel Werder & Cyrill Lim


    For Filmbulletin, I have only written three articles in 2019. Those on A GHOST STORY (Lowery, 2017) and ROLLING THUNDER REVUE (Scorsese, 2019) are only available in the print edition, the oneabout Barry Jenkins' IF BEALE STREET COULD TALK (2018) can be read here(in German).  




    [Contains spoilers for WATER LILIES, TOMBOY and GIRLHOOD]
    Céline Sciamma has made herself a name as an excellent screenwriter providing sensitive dialogue for Claude Barras' MA VIE DE COURGETTE (2016) or her own masterpiece PORTRAIT DE LA JEUNE FILLE EN FEU (2019). In her coming-of-age films, however, the most important means of expression is the human body.

    Based on an extensive analysis of NAISSANCE DES PIEUVRES (2007), TOMBOY (2011) and BANDE DE FILLES (2014), I attempt to provide a subjective, non-theoretical overview of how Sciamma tells her stories in a corporeal, physical way. Of course, beyond my general observations, there is much more to these images (costume design, colors, ambiguity, precise decisions when to show nudity) which I hope will present themselves to you and drive you to (re-)watch the actual films. There are countless scenes worth analyzing more closely.

    After an introduction to each film, there are five "movements" - MOVING, LOOKING, TOUCHING, PERFORMING, TRANSFORMING - and an EPILOGUE that hints at a shift towards more articulated characters in Sciamma's own feature films (not including her short film PAULINE (2010) which is all dialogue).

    Note: Thanks to Katharina Lindner's essential book "Film Bodies: Queer Feminist Encounters with Gender and Sexuality in Cinema" (2017) for clarifying some of my linguistic issues as a German speaker.





    Video Essay - for analytical and educational purposes only, no copyright infringement intended.

    The striking colors in Wim Wenders' PARIS TEXAS (1984) are often analyzed according to the preconceived notion of "red, white and blue" vs "green neon light" and the alleged meaning those color schemes transport. However, I see a more intuitive and much more complex use of colors at work in this film. That's why I've started to put together two video essays the first of which is concerned with COLORED LIGHTING IN PARIS, TEXAS.

    It is basically a supercut that showcases cinematographer Robby Müller's use of colored lighting that is found in roughly a quarter of the two and a half hour film. The selected shots are arranged in a non-chronological way that hopefully reveals recurring patterns of lighting by juxtaposing similar as well as contrasting setups. In addition, I have tried to follow the visual flow of gazes and movement to create unexpected relationships between unconnected shots.

    Since I am more interested in the atmospheric and emotional effects of colored light which I want you to experience for yourself, I deliberately abstained from written or spoken explanations.

    Instead, I invite you to discover the sensations, patterns and concepts on your own and encourage you to watch PARIS, TEXAS again with this in mind.



    But for those without the patience to watch the essay more than once, here are some aspects to look for:
    Light sources: traffic lights, especially red ones (00:00), neon signs and advertisements behind characters (00:22).

    Green neon light which is most often just normal "white" neon light that Robby Müller decided not to color correct because he embraced the well-known effect that it would look green on film (0:29). This section also showcases the powerful green lights vs red objects scheme.

    Characters in light (Anne) or silhouette (Travis) against green background lighting (00:37). Rim lights on characters: warm side lighting (left and right) against warm light in the middle (0:49), then overall beige vs blue with garish yellow light/objects against darkness and red rims (1:02). Round blue city lights vs rim lights on characters (01:10).

    Primary Colors: red vs blue vs yellow (01:15) as well as blue vs green vs red (01:25). Green light again: this time towards red light (01:37). Green, red and blue: from neon to nature (01:49).

    Light sources as visual patterns (02:00)
    Similar color schemes with dominating green (02:09).

    Primary colors: blue vs yellow vs red from different scenes showing the tension between these characters (02:15). The loneliness of flamboyant red and blue (02:25). Walking away (02:31)

    I added mirror images in order to highlight frame edges and direct the viewer's attention away from single shots to overall patterns. In keeping with that concept, the swelling sounds that announce the visual cuts are in fact acoustic mirror images (played backwards) of the corresponding guitar notes on which I cut (Ry Cooder's opening music).

    My other video essay on PARIS, TEXAS will be about yellow - a color that has been mostly neglected in previous analyses.



    An acting analysis of the animated protagonist of Paul King's PADDINGTON (2014)

    Released and published in Spring 2019 as part of Issue 14 of "The Cine-Files", a scholarly journal of cinema studies.

    For study and educational purposes only.

    Thanks to Tereza Fischer for publishing my video essays on filmbulletin.ch
    Thanks to Catherine Grant for screening my PARIS TEXAS video in the Uppsala short film festival and inspiring me to make the PADDINGTON video essay (and publishing it with Tracy Cox-Stanton in The Cine-Files #14).
    Thanks to Cyrill Lim for commissioning the music video.
    And last but not least, thanks to Justine Klaiber and Owley Samter for asking me to contribute to Animadvent 2019.

    My Year in Film - 2019 Favorites

    $
    0
    0

    When the object of desire looks back and becomes a subject...
    As I wrote before, this end of year post serves primarily to organize the glorious mess of cinematic impressions inside my head. The usual list of favorite films (those that impressed me the most) is followed by "general observations" which is basically a euphemism for cramming a whole year of cinematic cross reactions into one long monologue about songs, cinematography, nostalgia, horror and realism. Inevitably, certain films pop up in different contexts. [All images from films I studied in 2019. Click on them to fully see them].

    Most Memorable Cinema Experience
    My most memorable recent cinematic experience did neither take place inside a cinema nor did it include a screening in the narrower sense. It took place in Hawkins, Indiana in 1985… and since "friends" not only "don't lie" but also "don't tell", all I can say is: SecretCinema

    Hardly less memorable was a screening of the 4K restoration of Spike Lee's masterpiece DO THE RIGHT THING (1989) in Locarno. This one did involve an actual screen (Europe's largest open-air screen). It also involved a deafening thunderstorm that forced me to read Italian subtitles and at one point it rained so hard that the light did not even reach the screen any more. That's what I call an immersive experience. And I love the film even more now. 

    The best "regular" cinema experience was once again at the Annecy Festival where Jérémy Clapin's J'AI PERDU MON CORPS(2019) created a mass emotion - you could literally hear a thousand people breathe and gasp in unison.
     
    For a lecture on THE FAVOURITE...
    ...I studied the films of Lanthimos.

    Favorite New Releases
    As usual, my list of favorite new releases (= released in Switzerland in 2019) is in alphabetical order. Italicized titles did not get a regular theatrical release around here. Two of the year's best films, IF BEALE STREET COULD TALK (Jenkins, 2018) and THE FAVOURITE(Lanthimos, 2018), are missing from this list because I have already written about them last year.
    • AMAZING GRACE (Elliott/Pollack, 2018): Filmed in a former cinema-turned-church, AMAZING GRACE must be experienced on the big screen. Regardless of the sterile lighting, the camera equipment in the frame and the grainy 16mm close-ups originally designed for TV, there is an unmatched immediacy to this rare concert film that shows the performers both as great artists and as sentient human beings in all their natural awkwardness. 
    • BURNING (Lee Chang-Dong, 2018): A melancholy literary adaptation that keeps all the main characters ambivalent for more than two hours and still allowed me to dive deeply into their emotional lives. I'm keeping things vague on purpose: the less you know about it, the better.
    • FIRST REFORMED (Schrader, 2017): Like a benevolent contemporary Taxi Driver, Ethan Hawkes' despairing priest moves through a rigidly framed small town setting the coldness of which is almost palpable. Personal, ascetical and haunting - Schrader at his best.
    • J'AI PERDU MON CORPS (I LOST MY BODY  Clapin, 2019): Using a mixture of computer generated and hand-drawn animation, Jérémy Clapin's debut feature is about a severed human in search of its body. Like pieces of a puzzle, effortlessly interspersed flashbacks provide unexpected emotional depth and gradually reveal the overall picture. The voice-acting is exceptional. I LOST MY BODY is the rare independent animated feature that I can recommend to film fans outside the animation bubble.
    • LAZZARO FELICE* (Rohrwacher, 2018): What starts out like a down-to-earth depiction of archaic life in the countryside (in grainy 16mm) turns out to be a playful meditation on time and period. Drawing from folk tales and biblical metaphors, Alice Rohrwacher delivers magical realism as well as biting social commentary.
    • MARRIAGE STORY (Baumbach, 2019): Had it stopped after the opening voice-over narration, I would have already loved it. But then, it precisely works out how a divorce procedure deepens a rift between two people who in fact still love each other. On top of that, Baumbach turns out to be a master of mood swings and observational comedy that often made me want to laugh and cry at the same time.
    • MONOS (Landes, 2019): A film like an erratic block. No explanations, hardly any psychological insight, only glimpses of humanity. The harsh landscape, atavistic behaviour, piercing music (Mica Levi), hypnotic pacing and sheer visual beauty pulled me into this self-contained universe that is on the verge of coming apart.
    • PARASITE (Bong, 2019): Two families, one above, one below, plus an unexpected third party. All of them parasites, and all of them likable and human in some way or another. Meticulously constructed, both terrifying and wickedly funny, Bong's genre-bending stunner has it all: set pieces, precise montages, a choral score, a ghost, fake blood, jokes about wifi and odors, and above all an uncanny sense of rhythm. It is also a masterclass in how to use architectural spaces.
    • PORTRAIT DE LA JEUNE FILLE EN FEU* (Sciamma, 2019): For her first period film Sciamma employs a simple flashback structure that conveys both the experience of falling in love and the memory of that love. In addition to her trademark non-verbal storytelling, here, Sciamma also relies on some of the sharpest dialogue this year discussing the history of female painters, reflecting on the Orpheus myth, as well as deconstructing the myth of the muse. All the while, the emotional tension is steadily growing. Don't miss this quiet, tightly composed and incredibly sensual masterpiece.
    • RAY & LIZ (Billingham, 2018): A time capsule if ever there was one. All texture, patterns and vignettes, this unflattering portrait of photographer Richard Billingham's parents could not be any further from the current nostalgic view of the 1980s. For a while, I even felt uncomfortable laughing at these peculiar characters. But Billingham opens the door just about enough for the audience to empathize with them.
    • ROLLING THUNDER REVUE (Scorsese, 2019): As a huge fan of Dylan's first Rolling Thunder Revue of 1975 I was delighted to see some of these filmed performances fully restored. But Scorsese's "conjuring" of this "Bob Dylan Story" turned out to be more of an essay film than a documentary. Playing along with (and visually commenting on) Dylan's re-invention as an American entertainer (and Poet Laureate) by way of conscious omissions, contradictions and fake interviews, Scorsese adds snippets of fictional, promotional and educational films into the mix. Overall, this "fever-dream" works better as a counterpart than an update to Dylan's own RENALDO & CLARA (1978).
    • SORRY WE MISSED YOU (Loach, 2019): Ken Loach's fierce indictment of the gig economy may lack the poetic quality of earlier films like KES (1969). Yet, the sustained emotional impact stems from a relentless suspense plot steeped in astute observations of social realities (including tender moments) and a cast of characters with ample potential for identification.
    • FOR SAMA* (Al-Kateab/Watts, 2019):Whatever I thought I knew about life in Aleppo during the decade's worst war did not prepare me for what Waad Al-Kateab's hand-held videos captured inside a Syrian hospital. Her documentary (put together with British filmmaker Edward Watts) is incredibly tense with close-ups of dead children. But with scenes of caring for a newborn baby or preparing family dinner, it is also a testament to resilience in the face of mass destruction.
    • SYSTEMSPRENGER* (Fingscheidt, 2019): Nora Fingscheidt's pink sledgehammer of a film allows us to identify with both a difficult but otherwise lovable child (whose point-of-view we mostly share) and her therapists/social workers who are increasingly at a loss with her. By the time Nina Simone's "I got life" kicked off the end credits, I was pretty sure that 9-year old Helena Zengel was in fact playing herself (because how can anyone that young fake such erratic behavior in an authentic way?), but it turned out she already had quite a few acting credits before.
    First Impression
    One film I definitely want to revisit once it is widely released in Switzerland is...
    • LITTLE WOMEN* (Gerwig, 2019): Ever dreamed of having your cake and eat it? Well, if that dream included Saoirse Ronan, Florence Pugh, Eliza Scanlen, Timothée Chalamet, Laura Dern, Chris Cooper and a truckload of costumes, you are in for a treat. Greta Gerwig's adaptation of the often filmed Alcott novel restructures the timeline in a way that provides ample Norman Rockwell Americana but also some more realistic insight into the life of women in the 19th century. Pure festive joy.
    Looking at my list of favorite films above, there are productions from the US, the UK, France, South Korea, Italy, Syria, Colombia/Argentina and Germany (many of them co-produced with other countries), among them one animated feature, two concert films and a documentary. 5 out of 15 films were directed by women (marked by *). For common themes, subjects and styles see "General Observations" below.


    Gazing.
    Films that almost made the list include Jordan Peele's masterfully directed horror satire US (2019), Ari Aster's folk horror MIDSOMMAR (2019) and the Swedish misfit story GRÄNS/BORDER(Abbasi, 2018) that also dabbles in folk horror and is a sure contender for best makeup effects of the year. No less violent but more down-to-earth was HVITUR, HVITUR DAGUR/A WHITE, WHITE DAY (Palmason, 2019), the Icelandic equivalent of an arthouse Clint Eastwood film.

    Quite recently, I also saw A VIDA INVISIVEL/THE INVISIBLE LIFE OF EURIDICE GUSMAO(Aïnouz, 2019), a Brazilian melodrama that takes its cues from Sirk, Fassbinder and the colorful vegetation around Rio, dwells on the involuntary separation of two sisters and eludes the male gaze.

    Since I was too tired during the first half hour of Lulu Wang's THE FAREWELL*(2019) - it was the third or fourth film that day - I wasn't able to connect with it later on. I was struck, however, by Awkwafina's performance and the central questions. Oddly, Almodóvar's highly anticipated DOLOR Y GLORIA(2019) left me rather cold despite being wide awake. Still, it was intriguing enough to make me want to see it again (and hopefully enjoy it more).

    The same goes for THEIRISHMAN (Scorsese, 2019) which I found interesting. My inability to engage with it emotionally was likely due to false expectations (I wanted CASINO 2, not SILENCE without God) and a screening that was marred by the audience - Scorsese probably never imagined that people pay to see a Netflix film in a cinema and then use their smartphones at the same time, not in a silent way.

    When you find out that 48HRS is probably more honest than GREEN BOOK.
    Favorite TV Shows I Saw in 2019:
    • CHERNOBYL(Renck/Mazin, 2019): Apart from being a devastating suspense drama, CHERNOBYL drew attention to an important but often unnoticed convention of fictionalized "true stories": the amalgam character, a character combing aspects of several "real-life" persons into one screen/literary character. This gives the writers the necessary dramatic leeway and clarity of relationships. The fact that a whole group of scientists were represented by the fictional nuclear physicist Ulana Khomyuk gave us a character we could root for, an emotional center and at least one woman in the series with any real power. Acknowledging this in the way the creators did hopefully makes more people aware of such dramatic conventions necessary in any adaptation, be it of a novel or a real-life event.
    • FLEABAG 2* (Waller-Bridge/Bradbeer, 2019): Phoebe Waller-Bridge, need I say more?
    • MINDHUNTER 2 (Penhall/Fincher/Franklin/Dominik, 2019): I preferred the second season to the first one because it left the "monster-of-the-week" path for a more consistent arc concerning the Atlanta Child Murders embracing unsatisfying conclusions and loose ends.
    • ONDES DE CHOC* (Baier/Bron/Meier/Mermoud, 2018): An anthology of four one-hour films made by four film directors from the French part of Switzerland, each one inspired by a shocking real-life news item. Overall, they made for a compelling watch and a showcase of the quality that is theoretically possible in Swiss public television.
    • SHARP OBJECTS* (Noxon/Vallée, 2018): Like all of director Jean-Marc Vallée's works, this adaptation of a Gillian Flynn thriller is chock full of carefully chosen pop songs. Besides, how often do you see a mystery that delays the real denouement until the middle of the end credits? It also put Eliza Scanlen on the map (at least on mine).
    • STRANGER THINGS 3* (Duffers, 2019): Less Spielberg, more Cold War atmosphere, but also funnier than expected. It is also notable, that a series about nostalgia made the inevitability of change a central theme (handling it much better than most of the films it is based on). The standout here was Hopper's speech (with a telling reprise of "Heroes") accompanied by rare moments of temporally free-flowing editing within a season that otherwise often compromised its own suspense by too much cliffhanger-cross-cutting.
    • TATAMI GALAXY (Yuasa, 2010): Yuasa Masaaki is one of the most beloved "unknown" anime director, kind of a maverick who works fast, mixing different styles and crazy, exaggerated animation. Taking place within the same universe as his 2017 feature THE NIGHT IS SHORT, WALK ON GIRL, this series about a shy student on a quest to win the heart of a girl makes him and us relive the same scenes in every episode like a teen freak version of GROUNDHOG DAY (Ramis, 1993).
    • THE END OF THE F***ING WORLD 2* (Covell/Ekaragha/Forbes, 2019): I did not want a second season. However, I loved it. Naomi Ackie as Bonnie is truly stunning, so much going on in that face even when she's deliberately being opaque.
    • UNBELIEVABLE* (Cholodenko/Dinner/Grant, 2019): On the one hand, this non-lurid, slowburn thriller explores what makes a vulnerable person lie against their own interests. On the other hand, we get a suspenseful police procedural told from the perspective of two female detectives whose buddy relationship transcends mentor-apprentice stereotypes. Heartbreaking but hardly sentimental, UNBELIEVABLE is uniformly well-acted.
    • WHEN THEY SEE US* (DuVernay, 2019): Although I knew beforehand that it is impossible to watch this without getting overly emotional, there was one moment that shook me to the core. When Antron (Caleel Harris / Jovan Adepo) who was sent to prison as a boy comes out a fully grown man - we have all seen similar scenes in recent years - it suddenly dawned on me what it really means (as opposed to what it means dramatically) for someone to lose those crucial years to life in prison. Like Barry Jenkins or Sean Baker, Ava DuVernay and cinematographer Bradford Young tell a devastating story with as much beauty as possible.
    * shows or episodes created or directed by women.

    Patterns galore: Ruth E. Carter's costume design for DOLEMITE IS MY NAME.

    General Observations
    Priceless Acting Moments that still make me chuckle:
    • THE END OF THE F***ING WORLD 2 (Forsman/Covell): Jessica Barden not managing to distort her face into a smile at her own wedding.
    • US: The look on Adelaide's face (Lupita Nyong'o) after her "glitch" and Zora (Shahadi Wright Joseph) at the wheel.
    • MARRIAGE STORY: Adam Driver cutting himself in front of the awkward "visitor" and Alan Alda digressing into an endless joke.
    • A VIDA INVISÍVEL: The conservative father dismissing his daughter's apology by way of a moronic grimace. It also makes your blood curdle right after laughing about it.
    • STRANGER THINGS 3 (Duffer Brothers): two words: "Neverending Story".
    Whether in the sauna, the hospital or the underground lab: doors with rectangle windows.
    I got stripes: Amy Parris' costume design for STRANGER THINGS 3.

    The Power of Song
    In terms of pop songs carrying a whole scene, Spike Lee killed it with Stevie Wonder's "I never thought you'd leave in summer" in the delirious colorful post-breakup-Wonder-Wheel scene in SHE'S GOTTA HAVE IT 2.2. Pop songs as source music were also crucial in two of my favorite scenes of Tarantino's ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD: 1) the montage of Cliff (Pitt) driving home through LA at twilight. Not only did the music on the car stereo change with the cuts, but here nostalgia and (perceived) authenticity are also perfectly balanced. 2) When Cliff watches Manson arrive at what the latter believes to be Terry Melcher's residence, new owner Sharon Tate plays a Paul Revere record - produced by said Melcher.

    In Martin Scorsese's ROLLING THUNDER REVUE, there is a wtf moment when Dylan and Joan Baez half-jokingly accuse each other of running off and marrying someone else (which is an uncredited outtake of an autobiographically inspired performance from RENALDO & CLARA, 1978). My favorite bit of that film, however, happens when the camera accidentally captures a happy young girl near the stage suddenly bursting into tears. That was more or less how I felt when Aretha Franklin started singing the opening lines of "You've got a friend" in AMAZING GRACE.

    If you compare this homecoming concert (Aretha returned to the gospel of her youth) to Beyoncé's HOMECOMING* (2019), it becomes clear how much Aretha - despite her star status and commanding presence - still lived in a man's world in 1972. Rev. James Cleveland is a hilarious MC and Aretha's father is touching in his unscripted speech, but opposite these men, Aretha (the lady who taught the world "Respect") looks like a shy young woman who only opens her mouth to sing. Beyoncé, on the other hand, is mastermind, director and MC with a clear message. Nevertheless, both the free-flowing service from 1972 and the precisely choreographed Coachella shows from 2018 translate the live performance into an immersive cinematic experience (in the case of Beyoncé cleverly splicing the pink and the yellow night into one performance).

    Some years ago, I started paying attention to scenes in which main characters sing in movies that are not musicals. Since musicians' biopics and run-of-the-mill jukebox musicals have become popular again, the frequency of singing scenes in "normal" films and TV shows seems to have reached the heights of the 1930s and 40s. Whether it is lip-synching like in PLAY (Marciano, 2019), karaoke (THE FAREWELL), singing in a car (GRÄNS, UNBELIEVABLE) or performing a song like Joaquin Phoenix in JOKER (Phillips, 2019) or Adam Driver in MARRIAGE STORY, singing characters were everywhere in the past twelve months. The MARRIAGE STORY example also belongs to a new subcategory: the Stephen Sondheim scene. Saoirse Ronan had one in LADY BIRD(Gerwig, 2017), so has Daniel Craig - in a car - in Rian Johnson's KNIVES OUT (2019, "I'm losing my mind" from "Follies"). Even the JOKER's first victims sing Sondheim in the subway ("Send in the Clowns"). 

    Voices and choirs also featured in quite a few memorable scores for films like PORTRAIT DE LA JEUNE FILLE EN FEU (sort of a metadiegetic singing scene "fugere non possum"), PARASITE(music by Jung Jaeil), US (music by Michael Abels) or THE FAREWELL(music by Alex Weston). Weston and Abel are also some of the composers to watch in the future. So are Dan Levy (J'AI PERDU MON CORPS), Benedikt Schiefer (A VIDA INVISIVEL), Scott Bomar (DOLEMITE IS MY NAME) as well as Daniel Pemberton (MOTHERLESS BROOKLYN) and Nathan Johnson (KNIVES OUT) who both turned out to be more versatile than I thought.

    contrasting unobtrusive/old fashioned earth colors and patterns with fresh red, white and blue in BLINDED BY THE LIGHT (Chadha, 2019).
    The incredible cinematography of PORTRAIT DE LA JEUNE FILLE EN FEU.

    Cinematography
    In 2019, digital large format photographyhas become more commonplace than 3D. French cinematographer Claire Mathon, for example, used it for PORTRAIT DE LA JEUNE FILLE EN FEU because it allowed her to achieve painterly skin tones, bring out the costume colors and still work with relatively soft artificial lighting (that often feels like natural light). Films like JOKER (DoP Lawrence Sher) and MIDSOMMAR(DoP Pawel Pogorzelski) capitalized on the
    spatial dynamic (withoutwide-angle distortion) large format cinematography offers. The latter often choreographing action on foreground, middleground and background layers at the same time. It is also one of the most impressively shot films of the year (did I mention, there's also a choir?).


    Director of photography Hélène Louvart, on the other hand, filmed the flamboyantly saturated colors of A VIDA INVISIVEL on a handy Alexa Mini while using grainy Super 16mm for the more muted, naturalistic style of LAZZARO FELICE. Also, RAY & LIZ and the more lightweight MID90S(Hill, 2018) which I accidentally saw on the same day, were both shot on 16mm and in the more square Academy format (1:1.37). As is often the case, this random double feature (dictated by location and showtimes) revealed unexpected parallels between two very different films. Both are essentially time capsules built from vignettes that leave enough to the imagination to make the characters feel authentic. In both films a child stays out a whole night, someone steals from a family member and a child ends up almost dead.

    As for time capsules captured on film, it is impossible not to mention Tarantino's ONCEUPON A TIME… IN HOLLYWOOD(2019) that employed 8, 16 and 35mm and 1.33, 1.85 and 2.39:1 aspect ratios for various layers of reality (home movies, tv shows, "movie movie" and "realer than real" Tarantinoverses). In my opinion, it is Robert Richardson's masterpiece as far as atmosphere and period feel go. That said, I'm still conflicted about the movie itself: I admire the directing, rhythm and overall aesthetics, I just do not agree with what I believe it is saying. But since I managed to keep clear of writing yet another dreary think piece about OUATIH so far, I will just focus on two aspects. 

    Nostalgia [mild spoilers]
    Over the course of little more than a year, probably due to the sad anniversary of the Tate murders, the "Manson" character has become a staple of stylized American period entertainment. The first and most impressive of these recent characters (a failed musician played by Linus Roache) clearly modelled on cult leader Charles Manson popped up in Panos Cosmatos' paralyzingly psychedelic MANDY (2018). Later that same year, Drew Goddard's Tarantino-imitation BAD TIMES AT THE EL ROYALE introduced a showy Chris Hemsworth in a similar role (also with a fictional name) accompanied by "Twelve Thirty (Young Girls Are Coming To The Canyon)".


    That same Mamas & Papas song - that was reportedly playing when Tate's body was found - also announced the "young girls" and Tex (real names, this time) arriving at the Cielo Drive in ONCE UPON A TIME… IN HOLLYWOOD(surprisingly, both EL ROYALE and OUATIH also featured the Deep Purple cover of "Hush"). Damon Herriman as Manson only showed up shortly (see paragraph "Power of Song" above) but had the opportunity to fully explore the cult leader's weird charisma in a prison scene of MINDHUNTER 2.

    First and foremost, OUATIH is a celebration of cinema and self-adulation - we often see people watching themselves on a screen; once, we even "enter" the ray of light of a projector that has the same god-like quality that Rudy Ray Moore (Eddie Murphy) attributes to it in DOLEMITE IS MY NAME (Brewer, 2019). But more specifically, OUATIH is about a transitional period of American pop culture with August 1969 stylized into a watershed moment. 

    Add to that a playful patchwork narrative with layers of references (e.g. "the wrecking crew" alluding to a film, a group of musicians and the protagonists) told from the perspective of two privileged middle-aged men on the downgrade resisting any notion of change and you have a historical allegory that loudly asks "what does 1969 have in common with 2019?". This basic concept of period pieces is even literally invoked by the Sam Wanamaker (who really did direct the pilot episode of LANCER, but in 1968).

    But OUATIH is so drenched in nostalgia for a Hollywood system that clearly had to perish - major studios churning out overlong all-star action remakes like THE GREAT ESCAPE (Sturges, 1963), conservative professional westerns and TV series past their golden days - that it gets stuck in hippie bashing (with hippies likened to brain-washed murderers) and denouncing woke culture in a way that felt more like dog-whistling than satire (needless to say it did not embrace change in the way that other nostalgic summer escapist fantasy ST3 did). It all made sense from the point of view of Rick and Cliff. But their saving the day (also very much in character and hilariously funny) is the kind of wish fulfillment that goes against everything Tarantino conveyed in his revenge fantasies up to DJANGO UNCHAINED (2012).

    It made sense to root for outlaws like Django, the Bride in KILL BILL(2004), the women in DEATH PROOF (2007), or the jews in INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS (2009) because they all were self-empowered underdogs. Those films were all about ending oppression by established authorities, not stopping change from happening. But seeing middle-aged celebrity has-beens as underdogs is too much of a stretch. And where is the self-empowerment in that? Why weren't Bruce Lee and/or Tate herself saving the day? But hey, that is just, like, my opinion, Dude... and maybe it is not a bad thing that Tarantino finally managed to provoke me. 

    Popular in 2019: fun fairs and ferris wheels (SHE'S GOTTA HAVE IT 2).
    "I never dreamed you'd leave in summer"
    Horror
    Usually, the deaths that occur in pre-credits scenes of horror movies are of no real emotional consequence to the audience (just yet). In MIDSOMMAR, however, Ari Aster uses a tense prologue to charge his folk horror vision with emotions triggered by an unbearable family tragedy, less disturbing than the one in the first half of HEREDITARY (2018) maybe, but with the same lingering impact. It was certainly the first time that I was able to immerse myself deeply into a folk horror experience. Once again, Aster plays with genre conventions occasionally inverting them for comic effect.


    This is also true for PARASITE and US (2019) which echoed each other in quite a few aspects (characters "tethered" to each other, contrasting families, living below street level etc) and could both be categorized as prestige horror films with satirical elements taking on social injustice. Jordan Peele's American doppelgänger apocalypse also featured an escapist location that was wildly popular in 2019: IT CHAPTER TWO (prologue), SHE'S GOTTA HAVE IT 2 (Coney Island), TOY STORY 4 (Hitchcock reference and farewell) and STRANGER THINGS 3 ("the trees are moving!" among other Shakespeare references) all had a fun fair with a creepy house of mirrors and/or a ferris wheel (in JOKER, the one from "The Killing Joke" is seen in the background) rendered in the most delicious digital candy colors.

    While a creepy fair ground was a sure bet in IT 2 (Muschietti, 2019), I certainly did not expect Xavier Dolan to show up in it. Unlike in MIDSOMMAR, the impact of this violent opening scene did not last as long as it probably should have. What followed felt more like a series of standalone episodes (or levels of a computer game) before they all gathered for the tedious and ridiculous finale. However, with the second half of IT coming out only two months after ST3, it finally became clear how much the Duffer brothers - who originally created their Netflix phenomenon after not being able to direct the IT remake - reshuffled and paraphrased elements from Stephen King's tale and made it work much better on (the small) screen. Just think of the final voice over speech/letter. 

    On a side note, thanks to ST3 taking a few turns I was initially reluctant to follow (evil Russians, fat Rambo), I caught up with some previously shunned 1980s movies, among them RED DAWN (Milius, 1984: seriously?), HEATHERS(Lehmann, 1988: quite fun and memorable), and EVIL DEAD II (Raimi, 1987: love it!).

    WIP from an unfinished video essay about...

    ...the color yellow in PARIS, TEXAS (Wenders, 1984)


    Realism and Subjective Perception
    These days, I often think of Fassbinder's dictum "when I go to the cinema, I want an experience" (I'm paraphrasing). Judging from his own movies, I think what he had in mind was less 1917 (Mendes, 2019) than, say, JOY* (Mortezai, 2018), SHÉHÉRAZADE (Marlin, 2018) or DIVINES*(Benyamina, 2016) - all of which I liked because they each let me in on a young person's specific experience heretofore unknown to me. Besides, each one is told in a somewhat distinct style. To be clear, I'm not talking about masterpieces here. However, I still find it sad that all three movies went more or less directly to Netflix, even though there are 400-500 films p.a. released in cinemas around here.


    As regards contemporary issues, two Swiss films provided insight into local islamic communities. While AL SHAFAQ* (Isik, 2019), a feature film about a teenager from Zürich who joined the war in Syria, was convincing in its unagitated, thoughtful attitude towards a difficult subject, overall it felt too uneven to me. Anyhow, Kida Khodr Ramadan as the teen's father left a deep impression with a very restraint performance. But if I wanted to challenge prevalent stereotypes, I would probably recommend NAÏMA* (Milosevic, 2019), a compelling hour-long documentary about a middle-aged Muslim woman who manages a project to combat religious extremism in a small Swiss town.

    Sketching a different social environment, writer-director Hans Kaufmann and actor Joel Basman managed to make DER BÜEZER (THE WORKING MAN, 2019) outside of the usual funding channels of Swiss film productions. Deeply rooted in its Zürich milieu, this impressively photographed (DoP Pascal Walder) minimalist character study of a lone plumber is well-acted, atmospheric and so lean it leaves room for imagination (near the end, it felt rushed, although this was no issue with younger viewers). It is also easy to see DER BÜEZER as a paraphrase of Scorsese's TAXI DRIVER(1976), especially since it raises similar questions about our society (although the protagonist is by no means a reactionary like Travis Bickle).


    Thankfully, it came out before JOKER which was much more openly based on the sociocritical New York movies of the late 1970s, predominantly the Scorsese-De Niro collaborations. Although I enjoyed watching it twice, I found it not only confused about what it wanted to say but also too unsubtle to be taken seriously. Moreover, in comparison to many of the films it references, if often feels shallow. On the upside, TAXI DRIVER is now definitely one of my all-time favorite films.


    However, JOKER is a great conversation starter on many a pressing issue of our times. Besides, I loved the production design, the references to fictional and real clowns and most of all the allusions to Frank Sinatra (a self-stylized sad clown on "Only the lonely") who played a cynical stand-up comedian in THE JOKER IS WILD (1957), reportedly wanted to play the Joker on TV and even painted sad clowns in oil. So it is only fitting that the song that connects Arthur Fleck with De Niro's TV host is Sinatra's defiant version of "That's Life".


    THE IRISHMAN provided me with an excuse to revisit some more Scorsese-DeNiro movies. GOODFELLAS (1990) and CASINO (1995) made me realize two things: a) how Scorsese structures his films by turning excitement on and off like a car radio and every so often shocking us with complete silence; and b) how crucial the relationships involving Lorraine Bracco and Sharon Stone, respectively, are to the disturbing, explosive impact these films still have on me.

    This is especially interesting in the light of the more restraint IRISHMAN where female characters do not really figure in Frank's subjective version of the story. Nevertheless, Scorsese shows us women that feel real enough to have an (off-screen) life of their own (Frank simply does not listen to them) and relationships that are gradually destroyed by the kind of toxic masculinity of "professionals" that Tarantino unabashedly celebrates with his fairytale happy ending of ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD. 

    Epilogue
    In 2020, I have already seen Melina Matsoukas'QUEEN & SLIM*(2019) and Ladj Ly's LESMISÉRABLES (2019), two memorable feature length debuts depicting police brutality in very different settings. Both also feature a strong-willed boy who has never knew anything else. And both films turn out to be much more complex than they seem in the beginning. Both have to be seen on a large screen (Tat Radcliffe's cinematography brings to mind that worn out phrase "every frame a painting") and each one slows down in the second half to give the characters - and the audience - some space to breathe and think before the final powerful blow. One ends in suspension, the other one with an elegiac epilogue, though.

    [Note: sorry for the terrible layout. This design template is wearing me out... need to change that soon]

    The Age Of Emptiness

    $
    0
    0
    My contribution to lockdown culture:


    The Age Of Emptiness - Video Essay from Oswald Iten on Vimeo.

    Video essay based on Martin Scorsese's 1993 adaptation of Edith Wharton's novel "The Age Of Innocence" and Bernard Herrmann's score for TAXI DRIVER (Scorsese, 1976).

    "The Age Of Emptiness" takes a look at how we might also read Scorsese's film in our current situation of "Social Distancing". After all, the voice-over narration mentions people ("even young people") dying from pneumonia.

    Loneliness has always been present in Scorsese's films, especially in TAXI DRIVER. But in THE AGE OF INNOCENCE, out of 130 minutes (excluding credits) there are 8 minutes of shots completely devoid of human characters. Especially during voice-over passages, these always remind me of INDIA SONG (Duras, 1975).

    THE AGE OF INNOCENCE is exceptionally rich in visual motifs like hands, food, flowers (real, painted, embroidered...), cigars, fire, gloves, writing, paintings and lamps. So instead of another Scorsese-supercut, I attempted to tell a short story highlighting some of these motifs without showing a single human face (which meant I had to ditch the long shots of people sitting at a "social distance" of several feet from each other). No split screen, no explanatory voice-over, just images, music and text.

    When Michael Ballhaus once visited our university and talked specifically about THE AGE OF INNOCENCE, he emphasized that his main concern (in general) had always been "capturing the subtext" by way of camera moves and that the excessive use of dissolves in this film had partly been the result of having to trim tracking shots that went on for too long. Thus, my video essay "The Age Of Emptiness" is also a tribute to Ballhaus' cinematography and the editing of Thelma Schoonmaker.

    For study and educational purposes only.

    Lockdown Paintings

    $
    0
    0
    Since I've never managed to commit to challenges like Inktober for more than three or four drawings, I challenged myself to post a double feature movie recommendation (available on VOD in Switzerland) accompanied by a digitally painted mashup of the two films for 33 consecutive days on instagram. Needless to say that this limited my own time for watching movies to a bare minimum.

    Not everything turned out the way I imagined it, but overall, it was a satisfying exercise/project. So here are the 33 pictures in order of appearance. Hopefully, you'll see some of the films' elements and why I combined them.

    Parents: MOTHER (2009) and VATERS GARTEN (2013).
    The latter is not in the picture as I did not think of the mashup until after I posted the first one.

    Magical island life: LA VIDA ES SILBER (1998) / SONG OF THE SEA (2014)

    Parallel dimensions inside the computer:
    WELT AM DRAHT (1974) / SUMMER WARS (2009)

    Rhythm in your veins: WHIPLASH (2014) / BABY DRIVER (2017)

    Bakeries in Tokyo and Zurich: AN (2015) / BÄCKEREI ZÜRRER (1957)

    Colorful and naughty: THE FLORIDA PROJECT (2017) / ZAZIE DANS LE MÉTRO (1960)

    Tangled up in the past - two masterpieces about country vs city life:
    LAZZARO FELICE (2018) / ONLY YESTERDAY (1991)

    April fools - exceptional conditions:
    LE PRÉNOM (2012) / TURIST - FORCE MAJEURE (2014)

    Far from the city: THE RIDER (2018) / SAMEBLOD (2016)

    Unseen revelations: DEN SKYLDIGE (2018) / ABOUT ELLY (2009)

    Party nights gone astray: VICTORIA (2015) / THE NIGHT IS SHORT, WALK ON GIRL (2017)

    Shoplifters, oranges and substitute families:
    SHOPLIFTERS (2018) / PADDINGTON 2 (2017)


    Love in systems of oppression:
    BARBARA (2012) / PHOENIX (2014) / TRANSIT (2018)

    Tiny budget, incendiary speeches: ZÜRI BRÄNNT (1981) / BORN IN FLAMES (1983)

    Italianitá in contemporary Roman bohemia in LA GRANDE BELLEZZA (2013) ...

    ...vs working class migrant workers in Basel in SIAMO ITALIANI (1964)

    Self-empowerment: WOMAN AT WAR (2018) / VOLVER (2006)

    Good Friday. ABOUT ENDLESSNESS (2019) / LEVIATHAN (2014)

    Desire in isolation: PORTRAIT DE LA JEUNE FILLE EN FEU (2019) / HÖHENFEUER (1985)

    Easter Sunday: AMAZING GRACE (1972/2018) / LA FAMILLE BÉLIER (2014)

    It's never too late to engage with James Baldwin:
    IF BEALE STREET COULD TALK (2018) / I AM NOT YOUR NEGRO (2017)

    Beyond civilisation, between human and animal:
    MONOS (2019) / LA TORTUE ROUGE (2016)

    (Dys)functional families with a lot of heart:
    MA VIE DE COURGETTE (2016) / LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE (2006)

    Unreliable narrators in uncomfortable literary adaptations:
    BURNING (2018) / NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN (2007)

    Drawn into war: CHRIS THE SWISS (2018) / LES MISÉRABLES (2019)

    Hairy characters: TONI ERDMANN (2016) / DÄLLEBACH KARI (1970)

    Trying to connect:
    THE FAREWELL (2019) / ON BODY AND SOUL (2017) / ALOYS (2016)

    On and off in black and white: COLD WAR (2018) / FRANCES HA (2012)

    More than prison films:
    LES HIRONDELLES DE KABOUL (2019) / THE SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION (1994) / LA GRANDE ILLUSION (1937)

    Growing up in different neighborhoods:
    EIGHTH GRADE (2018) / DIVINES (2016)


    Falling in love: CAROL (2015) / CALL ME BY YOUR NAME (2017) / GOD'S OWN COUNTRY (2017)

    Family ties: MIDNIGHT FAMILY (2019) / STILL WALKING (2008)

    Shifting Sympathies: A SEPARATION (2011) / MARRIAGE STORY (2019)

    Back to the first theme "parents" in films about the filmmakers' own parents:
    VERGISS MEIN NICHT (2012) / RAY & LIZ (2019)

    Color Analysis: The Stag Fight

    $
    0
    0

    When Christian Renaut (author of „Les héroïnes Disney“) asked me for a comment on color in the stag fight scene in BAMBI (Hand, 1942), I felt the need to illustrate it with screenshots. Hence, my first color analysis post in years... 


    Although Walt Disney was predominantly striving for dimensionally believable, naturalistic settings (in the vein of 19th century illustrations) when it came to animated features, during the golden age (1937-1942) his overall emotional approach to storytelling allowed for expressionistic use of shape and color during tense/subjective moments.

     

    The resulting, less detailed backgrounds are easily integrated, however, since the characters (the focus of audience attention) keep their dimensionality, shape and proportions at all time. No flat shapes, no graphical abstraction. In addition, the Disney „dogma“ of value separation (i.e. either light character colors against dark background colors or vice versa) is closely followed, no matter how stylized the lighting gets. 

    Left: light character on dark BG / right: dark character against light BG.

    Concept art by Tyrus Wong (left via michaelbarrier.com, right via colossal.com)
     
    Visible brushstrokes and less details in more impressionistic approach.

    Thanks to Tyrus Wong's suggestive concept art, BAMBI generally feels much more impressionistic than the other films of that era. Besides atmospheric color choices, this impression mainly stems from a very selective degree of detail resulting in suggestive shapes of color and visible brush strokes. This is closely maintained throughout the two fantasy sequences when Bambi follows Faline through the clouds and during their stroll through the night.

     

    [Side note: the fantasy sequence immediately before the stag fight has the deer float among more or less realistically painted clouds that resemble the snow only with pink instead of yellow highlights.]

    Snow: light blue with yellow highlights / love clouds: with pink highlights

    Right between these two love scenes, however, Bambi has to fight his rival Ronno who suddenly appears behind a cloud and brings Bambi back down to earth.

    The actual stag fight takes only one minute, it leaves a strong impression not least because of its bold color design. In the backgrounds, there are a lot of expressionistic color transitions with a general arc from green and blue towards red and golden orange. But although the „story meeting commentary“ on the blu-ray insinuates that those color choices were guided by „symbolism throughout“, I believe that what made it to the screen works primarily on an emotional level without too much rationalizing. So in this analysis of the latest blu-ray transfer (which may differ from what the film looked like in Technicolor), I primarily look at how these color combinations work and how they affect me.

    The transition

    When the cloud setting transitions back to the forest, the familiar brown vs green contrast makes the deer stand out quite naturally. Furthermore, the shades of brown adhere to the well-established Hollywood convention of value-coding: the skin of the female love interest is paler (less saturated) than the hero's skin and in this scene leaning more towards violet. The villain Ronno is deliberately darker than Bambi, especially around the eyes, looking almost like a shadow version of Bambi with more dangerous antlers.

    Ronno the Rival
    different skin tones according to convention.

    Faline paler, Bambi "default", Ronno darker...

    While the scene starts out in a naturalistic way, the transition happens step by step. First, a brisk change in lighting after a cut indicates a subjectively heightened perception of the situation. The story notes mention a sunset, what we actually see is heightened contrast and saturation in the green background and glowing golden rim light on Faline and Ronno. This may not look natural but makes for a bold color contrast. The sunset impression also comes from the fact that during the whole stag fight, Bambi and Ronno are always dark against light (except for one short shot). Even in less extreme backlighting, this effect is supported by the rim light that is brighter than the white of the deers' eyes.

    During Bambi's attack from the right, the transition is taken further within a shot over the course of which Bambi's body becomes a dark silhouette against a backdrop of broad brush strokes and blue and green shapes devoid of detail (54:19:13).

    Bambi from the right, smooth lighting change against broad shapes.

    Ronno from the left.

    We then see Ronno's counter-attack from the left with hard lighting from the right (aka the expressionist sunset). Contrast is now so high that parts of the image remain pitch black. 


    What is more, although perspective and dimensionality are maintained, in the following long shot the level of detail is extremely low. A sketchy brown branch on the left and a silhouetted branch on the right provide the necessary depth cues with dramatic lighting setting the stage for the action.

    Cut from high contrast, high saturation to similar, more stylized background.
    This setup (right) resembles the style of the first hunting scare (left).

    And since Ronno's half of the background is a lot darker (above), this is the one shot where he is much lighter than Bambi and everything else in the shot. Thus, it looks like two contrasting forces (bright orange Ronno and pitch black Bambi) are about to collide.

    Ignoring color continuity

    However, when the actual collision happens in the next shot, both deer are equally dark against an abstract dark blue background. 


    In this elaborately animated shot, Ronno takes Bambi on his antlers and throws him to the left setting up the basic left-right-orientation for the remainder of the fight. At the same time, three basic concepts of the sequence are established:

    1. since the editing adheres to meticulous action continuity, the artists applied colors freely without paying attention from shot to shot. No matter how much the colors change from one shot to the next, there is always at least one element that remains stable across cuts.

    2. While the characters appear in „expensive Disney silhouettes“ (my own expression) – almost black but still with slight differences in color for lighter body parts and eyes – often against dark backgrounds, the movement is suggested a layer of fierce rim lights, sometimes containing additional highlights in an even brighter color.

    3. The degree of detail in the background varies greatly from just a direction of brushstrokes and gradient to some sketchily defined piece of vegetation or even fully rendered leaves and blades of grass. This way, we don't really see these color flashes as abstract backgrounds because like with the rim light on the characters, there are always enough representational elements in the frame to suggest a full setting.

     

    Stage-managing emotional color changes

    During Bambi and Ronno's initial clash, both are defined by the harsh orange sidelight (and fierce white highlights) of a heated confrontation. But during Bambi's fall to the left, his rim light turns cold as he enters a zone of fictitious blue light from above. Like in most of Disney's more expressionist sequences, this is much more reminiscent of elaborate stage lighting rather than abstract painting.

    This notion seems to be confirmed by the fact that when Ronno approaches Bambi he is also bathed in blue overhead lighting and only re-enters the hot orange zone when the action moves to the right (a prime example of the old orange vs teal contrast, if ever there was one).

    So rather than separating the two deer by colors, the lighting evokes the emotional involvement in the fight, sometimes using a hard cut to flip from hot to cold as Bambi goes down again (54:28:14).

    Then we get the first brief shot from Bambi's point of view: Ronno's orange/white rimmed silhouette runs straight at the camera against a non-representational gradient made of broad diagonal brush strokes.

    Now the darker rim light on both characters is green, somewhere inbetween the blue and green of the background. This overall green look is extended to a shot of Faline watching the action in an almost unicolored setup.

    Bambi's next attack begins with orange top light but only adds the white highlight in the spot where the two stags meet. Again, the background colors flip across an axial continuity cut from green to orange vs blue (54:37:07) with Ronno on the orange side and Bambi against a dark blue background looking up at Ronno attacking him yet again from a bright background (maybe looking up at a cloud or light source?) that emphasizes the darkness of Ronno's silhouette.


    BG colors change with hard cuts
    BG colors change with hard cuts
    BG colors change with hard cuts

    During the next wrestling match (54:45.10), by way of a pan, the green background turns to blue while the blue rimlight gradually transitions to red and orange, which is again reflected in a unicolored shot of Faline watching the action (now staged as shadows over her face and the rock behind her)

    continuous color change of rim light.

    The sunset justification

    Taking into account that all this was supposedly happening while the sun was setting on the right (the typical narrative pretense for colored lighting in Hollywood films at the time), we have now entered the final stage: the lower half of the backgrounds are already in the dark, devoid of warm sunlight.

    As we cut from a wide shot to a close-up of the wedged heads, the background snaps to a fully saturated diagonal gradient from dark blue over magenta to red reminiscent of the fierce red glow that occurs shortly after the sun has set (and foreshadows the forest fire). 

    The sky is now burning...

    Emotionally, the fully saturated red seems to tell us that we have reached the apex of the stag fight.

    With red fury on his side, Bambi is getting the upperhand

    Indeed, the two clash one last time. Only this time around, Bambi is strong enough to through Ronno off the cliff into the cold violet water (down below, so technically not in the warm part of the background any more). Remarkably, those last few shots have been defined by just enough representational detail that the fully dimensional background during Ronno's fall doesn't attract our attention.

    Again entering the striking highlight zone...

    Suggestive, leaving much to the imagination, but still representational.

    BG colors change with a hard cut.
    the final POV shot of Ronno attacking.

    The same BG in different colors, early expertise or later tampering?

    [Side note: BAMBI has been heavily "restored" for DVD and again for Blu-ray. Without getting into all the things that don't feel right to me, I am very curious about the original colors of this POV background (55:01:16, above). It is certainly the same painting. And although there were indeed procedures that allowed for these kinds of color changes, I am not sure if it really fit the sunset part as well on Technicolor or if it was "fixed" in order to smoothly match the original vision as opposed to what ended up on screen.]

    It's interesting how the same BG works for two different size relations!

    Generally, the diagonal left-to-right dynamics (Bambi's direction) are adhered to in abstraction as well.

    The iconic shot

    After this predominantly red climax, for the aftermath – and real payoff – the sky turns gold as Bambi towers over his rival in a simple but strong composition. By this saving-a-damsel-in-distress-and-proving-himself moment, Bambi seems to have earned the „prince of the forest“ staging. He may not yet be ready to succeed the old prince in all aspects, but it is certainly the first time, he is seen in this iconic pose that is backlit so the characters appear as clear silhouettes against a lighter backdrop.

    What is interesting about this shot is the direction: here, Bambi still looks to the right (i.e. "ahead" as the convention goes), while the adult Great Prince of the Forest always looks to left ("back" over his subjects, so to speak).
    The Great Prince of the Forest (Bambi's father?)

    And yes, in the end, Bambi himself becomes the Great Prince (or so it is visually suggested) taking over not only the pose and direction but the very spot of his predecessor (who is never verbally alluded to as his father).

    Bambi succeeds the Great Prince and looks back over "his" realm.

    All screenshots taken from the European blu-ray edition (time code based on 23.976fps).
    Click on the images for larger versions.




    My Year in Film - 2020 Favourites

    $
    0
    0

    In 2020, a lot of things were different. And so was my end of year review of films. Instead of the usual lengthy blog post, I did a series of instagram posts (reproduced here more or less unchanged) beginning with this here: "film of the year", only this year it is a collection of five films by Steve McQueen. Even before 2020, they were designed to blur the line between tv and film, as McQueen submitted them to festivals (some filmed in 35mm and 16mm) but wanted them to be as easily accessible as possible through the BBC and Amazon. In Switzerland through play.google.com

    But what's far more important: they may stand on their own, but you only get the full impact when you watch them in that order. Because McQueen counts on your remembering the background information provided by the films that came before.
    Before I digress into a full blown review: McQueen is still a master of audiovisual storytelling that often requires no dialogue. He does not intrude, but shows us the humanity of so many characters.
    There's a lot of era (and community) defining music, but hardly any musical score except for some Mica Levi magic. The filmmakers turn the Old Bailey into a church, let us experience a vintage house party and entertain us as much as they educate us.

    If you're from the West Indian community in London, this may be the first time you see yourself and your friends on screen for that long. If (like me) you're from anywhere else, it's basically mandatory viewing. Because, as one character puts it, "education is the key..."

    Favourite new releases











    My favourite new releases of 2020 (many of them elsewhere released in 2019) in alphabetical order:
    BACURAU / EMA / QUEEN & SLIM* / I'M THINKING OF ENDING THINGS / LES MISÉRABLES / NEVER RARELY SOMETIMES ALWAYS* / ROCKS* / SCHWESTERLEIN* / THE ASSISTANT* / THE SOUVENIR*
    (* = Female director)

    These are not necessarily the "best" films of the year, but the ones that impressed me the most in some way or another.

    On the downside, I have only seen half of them in an actual cinema. On the upside - and that really surprises me - it is definitely the first time that more than half of my top ten were directed by women!
    No animated film and no documentary has made the list.

    Special Mentions

    Although these films did not make my top ten, all of them are worth watching for several reasons. Two special mentions go to old favourites Spike Lee and Roy Andersson, the rest reflect my interest in color and lighting. Turns out that Netflix is the place for glorious black and white these days...


    Cross Reactions between Revisited Films

    Thanks to several analytical projects, I had an excuse to revisit a lot of favourite or at least interesting films in 2020.

    Sometimes, I discover unintended similarities between unconnected films simply because I watch them within the same day or week. Thanks to such coincidental cross reactions I often see familiar movies in a different light.
    Revisiting Todd Haynes' [SAFE] for a (canceled) lecture I not only found it to be his first masterpiece but also saw it as a great allegory - not for AIDS as is often suggested, but for our own time. Its disconnected protagonist, atmosphere, color concept and drone soundtrack suddenly made it a more realistic companion of THE NEON DEMON.

    When I revisited both THE BIRDS and TAKE SHELTER for another canceled lecture about "fear + sound", I saw both films in a new way... For the first time, the café scene in THE BIRDS with all the different opinions about a looming unseen threat felt not funny but too close to home. I also noticed how much Jeff Nichols' film plays like a nightmare you might have after seeing the Hitchcock classic...

     




    Great Films I Saw For The First Time in 2020

    Here are some of my favourite older films I saw for the first time in 2020. The first three were on my imaginary must-see-list for many years - and still floored me!






    Thanks to a recommendation by @mulmsie I caught up with LE TEMPS DU LOUP (TIME OF THE WOLF, 2003), one of the few Haneke films I knew nothing about.
    Thanks to researching Morricone's music for a public lecture, I had a reason to watch classics like SACCO E VANZETTI (Montaldo, 1971) and guilty pleasures like the more preposterous Morricone-Tornatore-collaborations like THE BEST OFFER (2013). Speaking of preposterous premises: I also caught up with a few Kiyoshi Kurosawa movies.
    Thanks to @mubi s Louis Malle selectrospective, I think I finally understood what makes those films tick. Special Mention goes to HUMAIN, TROP HUMAIN (1974) for making me watch how a Citroën car is built for 75 minutes without any notable commentary and not regretting any of it.

    In the spirit of the first post about SMALL AXE, the biggest thank you has to go to the @criterionchannel for making seminal works of black cinema available to people outside the US!

    Speaking of learning about black history: thanks to the National Theatre I enjoyed their production of "Small Island" including some bonus material on youtube.

    Favourite TV Series

    As sort of a blog bonus, the following were my favourite TV series of 2020. Since I usually watch TV pretty erratically (I don't really care when something is coming out), the list contains both old and new:

    • BOJACK HORSEMAN (final season, 2020)
    • FRIEDEN (Swiss Mini-Series, 2020)
    • KILLING EVE (season 1, 2018)
    • MIDNIGHT GOSPEL (2020)
    • OZARK (seasons 1-3, 2017-20)
    • ROMAN D'ADOS 2002-2008 (2010) 
    • THE THICK OF IT (all 4 seasons, 2005-2012)
    And somewhere in between theatre and tv, there was Simon McBurney's mindblowing stage performance THE ENCOUNTER (2015) designed for binaural headphones.

    Beyond the Catchy Tunes: George Bruns and Craft of Transparent Underscoring

    $
    0
    0

    Video essay about George Bruns and the craft of transparent underscoring within Walt Disney's music department during the Wolfgang Reitherman era (Sleeping Beauty 1959, Goliath II 1960, One Hundred and One Dalmatians 1961, The Sword in the Stone 1963, The Jungle Book 1967, Aristocats 1970, Robin Hood 1973). Made as part of the audiovisual section of the NECSUS Autumn 2020 issue #Method, curated by Liz Green.  

    More information about my intentions HERE.

    [SAFE] and THE NEON DEMON in Dialogue

    $
    0
    0

    Despite their obvious differences in story, theme and era, in my mind, Todd Haynes‘ [SAFE] and Nicolas Winding Refn’s THE NEON DEMON have somehow become tethered to each other. And I still do not know why, exactly.

    Do the detox cult in [SAFE] and the predatory fashion scene in DEMON represent two sides of a coin? Is it the protagonists‘ failures to really connect, the many static moments of women sitting in or on a bed? Is it the slightly creepy L.A. setting, the emotional distance, the electronic score, the turquoise/pink bedroom design, the directors‘ predilections for frames within frames?

    None of this is very extraordinary. Besides, if you compare two films, you always find both similarities and differences. So to explore those questions, I originally wanted to recreate the [SAFE] trailer with shots from THE NEON DEMON and vice versa. But I soon found that this was indeed too easy. So I decided only to include certain types of shots in order to suggest an alternative narrative based on the unaltered soundtrack of each original trailer. Additionally, I wanted to explore what an actual dialogue between the films‘ protagonists Carol and Jesse might reveal about their personalities and ultimately, how voices and speech patterns shape our impression of a character.


    Dialogue I: [DANGEROUS] from Oswald Iten on Vimeo.

    „But the basic, almost funny restriction that we placed on ourselves was this restrained coverage and distance from the character. The joke was, okay, let’s move in for a close-up but we never got very close. All of our proportions were appropriately adjusted from the starting point, which was wide. Minimal camera movement. “

    Todd Haynes, 1995 in filmmakermagazine.com

    Naturally in „Dialogue I“, I relied exclusively on camera movement, from following the characters unobtrusively to more formal and even autonomous motion.

    Dialogue II: IT'S OUT THERE from Oswald Iten on Vimeo.

    In „Dialogue II“, the focus is on shots devoid of human figures. Cinematography by Natasha Braier.

    Dialogue III: CAROL / JESSE from Oswald Iten on Vimeo.

    „Dialogue III“ invites the viewer/listener to explore not only the coincidental visual similarities (and the specific differences between them) but also to ask themselves whether they still perceive Carol (SAFE) and Jesse (DEMON) as specific characters when their interactions are reduced to generic situations and conversations. I’m especially interested to hear, how Carol and Jesse come across to viewers who haven’t seen the original films.


    Silence in THE PASSIONATE FRIENDS

    $
    0
    0

    Silence in The Passionate Friends from Oswald Iten on Vimeo.

    Audiovisual soundtrack analysis. [Spoiler alert: reveals important plot points and ending]

    David Lean's 1949 melodrama THE PASSIONATE FRIENDS never gained the same popularity as its similarly themed predecessor BRIEF ENCOUNTER (1945). Had it not been restored and re-released in 2008*, it might have been all but forgotten by now. And yet, there is a lot to cherish and enjoy within these 90 minutes.

    Despite its overall unevenness and unsatisfying ending**, THE PASSIONATE FRIENDS is probably my favourite among all of David Lean's films: the uncanny precision of an editor-turned-director at the top of his game, Guy Green's spectacular cinematography, a standout performance by Claude Rains (upstaging Lean's third wife Ann Todd), the recurring motifs of doors and wind (similar to GREAT EXPECTATIONS, 1946) and a lush soundtrack that is as complex as it is sensual.

    And that is what this video essay is all about: silence as a powerful storytelling tool.

    It was originally conceived as a companion piece to MELODRAMATIC RAILWAY SOUNDS (see below). But since I have eliminated most of the comparisons to BRIEF ENCOUNTER in the process, it definitely works as a standalone soundtrack analysis. In these essays, I always try to visualise sound objects in a way that is appropriate to the source material. This time, the challenge were sensual sound effects and silence itself.

    Except for my voice, all sounds in this video come from the audio track of THE PASSIONATE FRIENDS (and in respective clips from BRIEF ENCOUNTER), no equalizers or filters applied. Please note, that in order to highlight certain parts of the soundtrack, I constantly adjust the volume of the clips. This might go without saying. However, while most viewers notice frame, size or brightness changes in an image, sound changes tend to be less obtrusive. So if you want to get a sense of the full dynamic, there is no way around going back to the original film – which I recommend anyway.

    * A wonderful Blu-ray is available from Studio Canal in France (in English, of course).
    ** It is definitely worth reading up on the troubled adaptation and production process.

    Since January 2021, I am proud to be part of www.videoessayresearch.org, a research project at the Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts. 

    Melodramatic Railway Sounds - Video Essay from Oswald Iten on Vimeo.

    Two New Audiovisual Essays

    $
    0
    0

    "Berlin Alexanderplatz" in one word. For the TV Dictionary Collection by Ariel Avissar: TV Dictionary Collection

    Switching channels between definitions in English (Merriam-Webster / Collins Dictionary) and German (Duden). 

    For study purposes only. 

    All excerpts taken from Rainer Werner Fassbinders 1980 TV series BERLIN ALEXANDERPLATZ (A FILM IN 13 PARTS AND AN EPILOGUE).


    Colored Lighting in PARIAH from Oswald Iten on Vimeo.

    "We weren't about notions of 'real time' so we became mainly concerned with levels of impressionism in our visual style. Basically, how far could we go with coloring characters and spaces before it started to become distracting and take away from the narrative?" Bradford Young on PARIAH
    shadowandact.com/the-visual-aesthetic-of-pariah-an-interview-w-cinematographer-bradford-young

    When it was released in 2011, Dee Rees’ debut feature PARIAH was ground-breaking and inspiring in many ways. Even ten years later, the thoroughness with which the inner journey of protagonist Alike is expressed via colored lighting remains quite unique. According to several interviews, the striking color concept of PARIAH was devised by Rees and Bradford Young. Heavily influenced by Haile Gerima and cinematographers like Arthur Jafa, Ernest Dickerson or Malik Hassan Sayeed, Young is not only one of the most interesting cinematographers of our time but also an important voice in the ongoing conversation about how to represent and photograph people of color on screen.

    In this experimental visual analysis, I am exploring the "levels of impressionism" (Young) in the lighting of Alike’s face. Inevitably, it has also turned into a celebration of Adepero Oduye's remarkable performance in this very specific but universally relatable piece of cinema.

    Breakdown:
    00:00 Atmosphere
    00:50 Chameleon: Painted by the Colors Around Her
    01:24 From Darkness to Light
    02:08 Contrasting Color vs Blending In
    02:43 God Doesn't Make Mistakes
    03:32 Butterfly: Life is Possible

    Cinematography: Bradford Young
    Gaffer: T.J. Alston
    DI Colorist: Joe Gawler

    While all the visual clips are from PARIAH (Blu-ray Focus Features Spotlight Series 2012), the music consists of excerpts from several compositions by Tamar-Kali who appeared in the film (representing the influence of Alike’s friend Bina) and went on to score the director’s later film MUDBOUND (2017).
    - Pearl (Psychochamber Version) 2009
    - MUDBOUND (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack) 2017

    There are a couple of interviews with Young and Rees that go into more detail about their approach to color, e.g. the interview linked at the top or the following: interviewmagazine.com/film/dee-rees-pariah
    If you are interested in more behind the scenes material, there is a great interview with the cast and crew online (Academy Museum, 2021): youtube.com/watch?v=1fhPrs_K0aU

    Viewing all 122 articles
    Browse latest View live